An interval matrix method used to optimize the decision matrix in AHP technique for land subsidence susceptibility mapping

作者: Thomas Blaschke , Omid Ghorbanzadeh , Bakhtiar Feizizadeh

DOI: 10.1007/S12665-018-7758-Y

关键词:

摘要: The analytical hierarchy process (AHP) is one of the most effective methods for criteria ranking/weighting to have been successfully incorporated into GIS analyses. We present a new method optimizing pairwise comparison decision-making matrices in AHP method, which has developed on basis an interval matrix (IPCM) derived from expert knowledge. used ranking land subsidence susceptibility mapping (LSSM) as practical test case, was generated by comparison. To compare capability (a traditional approach) with that proposed IPCM novel approach), 11 creations LSSM were ranked using each approach turn. weightings obtained then produce maps based these approaches. results tested against data set known occurrences, indicating improvement accuracy about 14% map method. This achieved minimizing uncertainty associated and could form future research Our will be considerable importance researchers involved GIS-based multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) those dealing spatial methods.

参考文章(77)
Mohammad Rastegarfar, Roghieh Akbar Ashrafi, Hamed Reza Khorramrooz, Neda Ghazipour, Maryam Dehghani, Interferometric SAR and Geospatial Techniques Used for Subsidence Study in the Rafsanjan Plain American Journal of Environmental Engineering. ,vol. 4, pp. 32- 40 ,(2014)
M.R. Jadidi, M.S. Sabuni, M. Homayounifar, A. Mohammadi, Assessment of energy use pattern for tomato production in Iran: a case study from the Marand region. Research in Agricultural Engineering. ,vol. 58, pp. 50- 56 ,(2018) , 10.17221/32/2010-RAE
Gholam Reza Lashkaripour, A. Asghari-Moghadam, M. Allaf-Najib, The effect of water table decline on the groundwater quality in Marand plain, northeast Iran Iranian International Journal of Science. ,vol. 6, ,(2005)
Konrad Kułakowski, Notes on order preservation and consistency in AHP European Journal of Operational Research. ,vol. 245, pp. 333- 337 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.EJOR.2015.03.010