作者: Claes Wohlin , Per Runeson , Paulo Anselmo da Mota Silveira Neto , Emelie Engström , Ivan do Carmo Machado
DOI: 10.1016/J.JSS.2013.04.076
关键词: Systematic review 、 Point (typography) 、 Computer science 、 Software product line 、 Reliability (statistics) 、 Software engineering 、 Hardware and Architecture 、 Software 、 Information Systems
摘要: Background: Systematic literature reviews and systematic mapping studies are becoming increasingly common in software engineering, hence it becomes even more important to better understand the reliability of such studies. Objective: This paper presents a study two evaluate point out some challenges related this type engineering. Method: The research is based on an in-depth case published product line testing. Results: We found that despite fact addressing same topic, there quite number differences when comes papers included terms classification Conclusions: From we conclude although important, their cannot simply be taken for granted. Based findings also provide four conjectures further has address make secondary (systematic reviews) valuable both researchers practitioners. (Less)