Going Beyond the Problem Given: How Human Tutors Use Post-practice Discussions to Support Transfer

作者: Sandra Katz , David Allbritton

DOI: 10.1007/3-540-47987-2_65

关键词: Computer scienceTable (database)DebriefingUser assistanceMultimedia

摘要: Recent studies reveal that human tutoring sessions do not always end when the student has solved a problem. Instead, tutors and students frequently use post-practice discussion to bring new topics table or continue problem-solving discussions. One of main roles dialogues is support transfer--that is, student's ability apply concepts adapt familiar solution strategies unfamiliar problems. Several developers intelligent systems have implemented modules, with similar aims. However, in contrast integrated instructional planning apparently perform, automated reflective activities typically done independently during problem solving. We present framework for describing plans are distributed between solving debrief evidence discussions transfer elementary mechanics.

参考文章(42)
John A. Self, Fabio N. Akhras, System Intelligence in Constructivist Learning ,(2000)
Robert Gaimari, Frank Linton, Amy Soller, Bradley Goodman, Encouraging Student Reflection and Articulation using a Learning Companion ,(1998)
Johanna D. Moore, Making computer tutors more like humans artificial intelligence in education. ,vol. 7, pp. 181- 214 ,(1996)
Donald Thomas Campbell, Thomas D. Cook, Quasi-Experimentation: Design & Analysis Issues for Field Settings ,(1979)
Sandra P. Marshall, Schemas in Problem Solving ,(1995)
John R. Frederiksen, Barbara Y. White, Todd A. Shimoda, Enabling Students to Construct Theories of Collaborative Inquiry and Reflective Learning: Computer Support for Metacognitive Development artificial intelligence in education. ,vol. 10, pp. 151- 182 ,(1999)
Alan Lesgold, Sandra Katz, Linda Greenberg, Edward Hughes, Gary Eggan, Extensions of intelligent tutoring paradigms to support collaborative learning Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. pp. 291- 311 ,(1992) , 10.1007/978-3-662-02840-7_18