Using discrete choice experiments to estimate willingness-to-pay intervals

作者: Christian Schlereth , Christine Eckert , Bernd Skiera

DOI: 10.1007/S11002-012-9177-2

关键词: EconometricsValue (economics)AttractivenessEconomicsWillingness to payIndex (economics)Contrast (statistics)Range (statistics)Interval (mathematics)Point estimation

摘要: Willingness-to-pay has always been conceptualized as a point estimate, frequently the price that makes consumer indifferent between buying and not product. In contrast, this article estimates willingness-to-pay (WTP) an interval based on discrete choice experiments scale-adjusted latent-class model. The middle value of corresponds to traditional WTP estimate depends deterministic utility; range sensitivity utility’s error variance (scale). With conceptualization WTP, we propose new measure, attractiveness index, which serves identify attractive consumers by combining knowledge about their sensitivities variances. An empirical study demonstrates index identifies most consumers, who do necessarily have largest estimates. Furthermore, with comparable preferences can differ in purchase probability average 16%, reflected differences intervals, yields implications for more customized target marketing.

参考文章(25)
Yorgos Y. Papageorgiou, Gordon M. Myers, Andre De Palma, Rational Choice Under an Imperfect Ability To Choose The American Economic Review. ,vol. 84, pp. 419- 440 ,(1994)
Jordan Louviere, Deborah Street, Richard Carson, Andrew Ainslie, J. R. Deshazo, Trudy Cameron, David Hensher, Robert Kohn, Tony Marley, Dissecting the Random Component of Utility Marketing Letters. ,vol. 13, pp. 177- 193 ,(2002) , 10.1023/A:1020258402210
James R. Bettman, Deborah Roedder John, Carol A. Scott, Covariation Assessment by Consumers Journal of Consumer Research. ,vol. 13, pp. 316- 326 ,(1986) , 10.1086/209071
Florian Dost, Robert Wilken, Measuring willingness to pay as a range, revisited: When should we care? International Journal of Research in Marketing. ,vol. 29, pp. 148- 166 ,(2012) , 10.1016/J.IJRESMAR.2011.09.003
Denzil G. Fiebig, Michael P. Keane, Jordan Louviere, Nada Wasi, The Generalized Multinomial Logit Model: Accounting for Scale and Coefficient Heterogeneity Marketing Science. ,vol. 29, pp. 393- 421 ,(2010) , 10.1287/MKSC.1090.0508
W. R. Dubourg, M. W. Jones-Lee, Graham Loomes, Imprecise preferences and the WTP-WTA disparity Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. ,vol. 9, pp. 115- 133 ,(1994) , 10.1007/BF01064181
Joffre Swait, Jordan Louviere, The Role of the Scale Parameter in the Estimation and Comparison of Multinomial Logit Models Journal of Marketing Research. ,vol. 30, pp. 305- 314 ,(1993) , 10.1177/002224379303000303
Loran F. Nordgren, Ap Dijksterhuis, The Devil Is in the Deliberation: Thinking Too Much Reduces Preference Consistency Journal of Consumer Research. ,vol. 36, pp. 39- 46 ,(2009) , 10.1086/596306
Peter Bohm, Revealing demand for an actual public good Journal of Public Economics. ,vol. 24, pp. 135- 151 ,(1984) , 10.1016/0047-2727(84)90021-5