Systematic Reviews: A Social Work Perspective
作者： Beth R. Crisp
DOI: 10.1080/0312407X.2015.1024266
关键词: Systematic review 、 Perspective (graphical) 、 Key issues 、 Research data 、 Social work 、 Evidence-based practice 、 Medicine 、 Alternative medicine 、 Engineering ethics
摘要: Systematic reviews are gaining prominence and recognition as being an important methodological approach to dealing with ever growing amounts of research data, recent years have seen the development guidelines for both conduct reporting systematic reviews. Initially came a method synthesising data emerging from Randomised Control Trials (RCTs) but increasingly term “systematic review” is used in regards studies wide range designs. However, among Australian social workers, utilisation has been limited. This paper will explore question what review is, introduce some key issues undertaking such review, implications emergence work perspective.
sci-hub.se 参考文章(59)
J. Orme, M. Anderson, B. Crisp, Pam Green Lister, Learning and teaching in social work education: assessment. Volume 1 of knowledge review Policy Press. ,(2003)
Karin Hannes, Angela Harden, Multi-context versus context-specific qualitative evidence syntheses: combining the best of both Research Synthesis Methods. ,vol. 2, pp. 271- 278 ,(2011) , 10.1002/JRSM.55
Claire Stansfield, James Thomas, Josephine Kavanagh, ‘Clustering’ documents automatically to support scoping reviews of research: a case study Research Synthesis Methods. ,vol. 4, pp. 230- 241 ,(2013) , 10.1002/JRSM.1082
Gracia LT Fellmeth, Catherine Heffernan, Joanna Nurse, Shakiba Habibula, Dinesh Sethi, Educational and Skills-Based Interventions for Preventing Relationship and Dating Violence in Adolescents and Young Adults: A Systematic Review Campbell Systematic Reviews. ,vol. 9, pp. 124- ,(2013) , 10.4073/CSR.2013.14
Paul Fehrmann, Joelle Thomas, Comprehensive computer searches and reporting in systematic reviews. Research Synthesis Methods. ,vol. 2, pp. 15- 32 ,(2011) , 10.1002/JRSM.31
Tamara Rader, Mala Mann, Claire Stansfield, Chris Cooper, Margaret Sampson, Methods for documenting systematic review searches: a discussion of common issues. Research Synthesis Methods. ,vol. 5, pp. 98- 115 ,(2014) , 10.1002/JRSM.1097
Jessica K. Paulus, Issa J. Dahabreh, Ethan M. Balk, Esther E. Avendano, Joseph Lau, Stanley Ip, Opportunities and challenges in using studies without a control group in comparative effectiveness reviews. Research Synthesis Methods. ,vol. 5, pp. 152- 161 ,(2014) , 10.1002/JRSM.1101
Quenby Mahood, Dwayne Van Eerd, Emma Irvin, None, Searching for grey literature for systematic reviews: challenges and benefits Research Synthesis Methods. ,vol. 5, pp. 221- 234 ,(2014) , 10.1002/JRSM.1106
Jeffrey C. Valentine, Simon G. Thompson, Issues relating to confounding and meta-analysis when including non-randomized studies in systematic reviews on the effects of interventions. Research Synthesis Methods. ,vol. 4, pp. 26- 35 ,(2013) , 10.1002/JRSM.1064
Marc Winokur, Amy Holtan, Keri E Batchelder, Kinship care for the safety, permanency, and well-being of children removed from the home for maltreatment Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. ,vol. 5, pp. 1- 171 ,(2014) , 10.1002/14651858.CD006546.PUB3