The legal risks of returning results of genomics research

作者: Ellen Wright Clayton , Amy L. McGuire

DOI: 10.1038/GIM.2012.10

关键词: DutyReturn of resultsTruth DisclosureObligationStandard of careEthical obligationLaw and economicsBiobankWorryMedicine

摘要: Published guidelines suggest that research results and incidental findings should be offered to study participants under some circumstances. Although have argued against the return of in research, many cite an emerging consensus there is ethical obligation at least results; debate quickly turns issues mechanics (e.g., which results? who discloses? for how long does exist?). commentators are careful distinguish this as rather than legal obligation, we worry may unjustifiably become standard care based on growing “consensus,” could lead a (negligence-based) duty offer individualized genetic results. We caution argue essay date has failed give adequate weight number fundamental policy undergird first instance, go differences between clinical care. confine our comments using data from large biobanks, topic proposed symposium issue.

参考文章(27)
Joan S Ash, Marc Berg, Enrico Coiera, Some Unintended Consequences of Information Technology in Health Care: The Nature of Patient Care Information System-related Errors Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. ,vol. 11, pp. 104- 112 ,(2003) , 10.1197/JAMIA.M1471
Christopher Heaney, Genevieve Tindall, Joe Lucas, Susanne B. Haga, Researcher Practices on Returning Genetic Research Results Genetic Testing and Molecular Biomarkers. ,vol. 14, pp. 821- 827 ,(2010) , 10.1089/GTMB.2010.0066
Juli Murphy, Joan Scott, David Kaufman, Gail Geller, Lisa LeRoy, Kathy Hudson, Public Expectations for Return of Results from Large-Cohort Genetic Research American Journal of Bioethics. ,vol. 8, pp. 36- 43 ,(2008) , 10.1080/15265160802513093
Susan M. Wolf, Frances P. Lawrenz, Charles A. Nelson, Jeffrey P. Kahn, Mildred K. Cho, Ellen Wright Clayton, Joel G. Fletcher, Michael K. Georgieff, Dale Hammerschmidt, Kathy Hudson, Judy Illes, Vivek Kapur, Moira A. Keane, Barbara A. Koenig, Bonnie S. LeRoy, Elizabeth G. McFarland, Jordan Paradise, Lisa S. Parker, Sharon F. Terry, Brian Van Ness, Benjamin S. Wilfond, Managing incidental findings in human subjects research: Analysis and recommendations Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics. ,vol. 36, pp. 219- 248 ,(2008) , 10.1111/J.1748-720X.2008.00266.X
Stephanie M. Fullerton, Wendy A. Wolf, Kyle B. Brothers, Ellen Wright Clayton, Dana C. Crawford, Joshua C. Denny, Philip Greenland, Barbara A. Koenig, Kathleen A. Leppig, Noralane M. Lindor, Catherine A. McCarty, Amy L. McGuire, Eugenia R. McPeek Hinz, Daniel B. Mirel, Erin M. Ramos, Marylyn D. Ritchie, Maureen E. Smith, Carol J. Waudby, Wylie Burke, Gail P. Jarvik, Return of individual research results from genome-wide association studies: experience of the Electronic Medical Records and Genomics (eMERGE) Network. Genetics in Medicine. ,vol. 14, pp. 424- 431 ,(2012) , 10.1038/GIM.2012.15
Jennifer L. Fitzpatrick, Cecil Hahn, Teresa Costa, Marlene J. Huggins, The Duty to Recontact: Attitudes of Genetics Service Providers American Journal of Human Genetics. ,vol. 64, pp. 852- 860 ,(1999) , 10.1086/302293
David I. Shalowitz, Franklin G. Miller, Disclosing Individual Results of Clinical Research JAMA. ,vol. 294, pp. 737- 740 ,(2005) , 10.1001/JAMA.294.6.737