What criteria should be used to select biodiversity indicators

作者: Ulrich Heink , Ingo Kowarik

DOI: 10.1007/S10531-010-9926-6

关键词: BiodiversityGeographyEcology (disciplines)Selection (genetic algorithm)Transparency (graphic)Environmental resource managementEnvironmental impact assessmentQuality (business)Ecological indicatorMeasurement of biodiversity

摘要: The conservation of biodiversity is a major goal in nature conservation, but measuring the total site or region not possible; thus there great demand for indicators to represent biodiversity. To be able make use indicators, criteria must first established their selection, and degree which meet tested. However, purposes are applied—and sometimes themselves—differ between ecological science environmental policy. As transparency choosing testing suitable will optimize results an indicator, this article aims determine if common approaches selecting ecology Second, we asked were scientifically tested against suitability. answer these questions, analyzed papers on referenced Web Science. Our demonstrate different patterns fields application. In ecology, quality mainly determined by close relationship indicator indicandum (i.e., indicated phenomenon), while relevance given issue, e.g., reserve selection assessment certain impact, paramount importance Surprisingly, few empirically they purportedly chosen. We argue that due conceptualizations Since suitability remains untested many cases, our findings suggest room better research put solve problems, should correspond large extent with those used Further, assess it all relevant its selection.

参考文章(98)
Frode Olsgard, Torleiv Brattegard, Torleif Holthe, Polychaetes as surrogates for marine biodiversity: lower taxonomic resolution and indicator groups Biodiversity and Conservation. ,vol. 12, pp. 1033- 1049 ,(2003) , 10.1023/A:1022800405253
Rita C. Schenck, Land use and biodiversity indicators for life cycle impact assessment International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. ,vol. 6, pp. 114- 117 ,(2001) , 10.1007/BF02977848
John D.C. Linnell, Jon E. Swenson, Reidar Andersen, Conservation of biodiversity in Scandinavian boreal forests: large carnivores as flagships, umbrellas, indicators, or keystones? Biodiversity and Conservation. ,vol. 9, pp. 857- 868 ,(2000) , 10.1023/A:1008969104618
Paul L. Angermeier, James R. Karr, Biological Integrity versus Biological Diversity as Policy DirectivesProtecting biotic resources BioScience. ,vol. 44, pp. 690- 697 ,(1994) , 10.2307/1312512
Bengt Gunnar Jonsson, Mats Jonsell, Exploring potential biodiversity indicators in boreal forests Biodiversity and Conservation. ,vol. 8, pp. 1417- 1433 ,(1999) , 10.1023/A:1008900309571
David M. Stoms, GAP management status and regional indicators of threats to biodiversity Landscape Ecology. ,vol. 15, pp. 21- 33 ,(2000) , 10.1023/A:1008105026956
Anselm L. Strauss, Juliet M. Corbin, Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory Published in <b>1998</b> in Thousand Oaks (Calif.) by Sage. ,(1998)
Brad Bass, Roger Hansell, Jae Choi, Towards a Simple Indicator of Biodiversity Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. ,vol. 49, pp. 337- 347 ,(1998) , 10.1023/A:1005811329763
Fabrizio Sergio, Luigi Marchesi, Paolo Pedrini, Integrating individual habitat choices and regional distribution of a biodiversity indicator and top predator Journal of Biogeography. ,vol. 31, pp. 619- 628 ,(2004) , 10.1046/J.1365-2699.2003.01002.X