Surveillance and outcomes after curative resection for gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma

作者: Di M. Jiang , Chihiro Suzuki , Osvaldo Espin‐Garcia , Charles H. Lim , Lucy X. Ma

DOI: 10.1002/CAM4.2948

关键词: Multimodality TherapyRetrospective cohort studyPhysical examinationAdjuvant therapyGastroesophageal adenocarcinomaMedicineSurgerySalvage therapyDiseaseLog-rank test

摘要: Background: The goal of surveillance testing is to enable curative salvage therapy through early disease detection, however supporting evidence in gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma limited. We evaluated frequency successful and outcomes patients who underwent surveillance. Methods: A single-site, retrospective cohort study was conducted identify all received resection for adenocarcinoma. Surveillance were those investigations not triggered by abnormal symptoms, physical examination, or blood tests. Successful any potentially recurrence which resulted postrecurrence disease-free survival ≥2 years. Time-to-event data analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method log rank Results: Between 2011 2016, 210 consecutive reviewed. Esophageal (14%), junction (40%), gastric adenocarcinomas (45%) treated with surgery alone (29%) multimodality (71%). Adjuvant administered 35%. At median follow-up 38.3 months, 5-year overall (OS) rate 56%. Among 97 recurrences, 53% surveillance-detected, 46% symptomatic. None detected endoscopy. Median time-to-recurrence (TTR) 14.8 months. Recurrences included locoregional only (4%), distant (86%), both (10%). Salvage attempted 15 patients, 4 successful. Compared symptomatic surveillance-detected recurrences had longer OS (36.2 vs 23.7 months, P =.004) (PRS, 16.5 4.6 months, P <.001), but similar TTR (16.2 13.3 months, P =.40) duration palliative chemotherapy (3.9 3.3 months, P =.64). Conclusions: surveyed, 96% distant, 1.9% patients. Longer compared associated significant earlier may be contributed differences biology. Further prospective are warranted establish benefit

参考文章(28)
Gian Luca Baiocchi, Domenico D’Ugo, Daniel Coit, Richard Hardwick, Paulo Kassab, Atsushi Nashimoto, Daniele Marrelli, William Allum, Alfredo Berruti, Servarayan Murugesan Chandramohan, Natalie Coburn, Santiago Gonzàlez-Moreno, Arnulf Hoelscher, Edwin Jansen, Marcis Leja, Christophe Mariette, Hans-Joachim Meyer, Stefan Mönig, Paolo Morgagni, Katia Ott, Shaun Preston, Sun Young Rha, Franco Roviello, Takeshi Sano, Mitsuru Sasako, Hideaki Shimada, Cristoph Schuhmacher, Jimmy So Bok-yan, Vivian Strong, Takaki Yoshikawa, Masanori Terashima, Michail Ter-Ovanesov, Cornelis Van der Velde, Maurizio Memo, Francesco Castelli, Sergio Pecorelli, Claudio Detogni, Yasuhiro Kodera, Giovanni de Manzoni, Follow-up after gastrectomy for cancer: the Charter Scaligero Consensus Conference Gastric Cancer. ,vol. 19, pp. 15- 20 ,(2016) , 10.1007/S10120-015-0513-0
Gian Luca Baiocchi, Yasuhiro Kodera, Daniele Marrelli, Fabio Pacelli, Paolo Morgagni, Franco Roviello, Giovanni De Manzoni, Follow-up after gastrectomy for cancer: Results of an international web round table World Journal of Gastroenterology. ,vol. 20, pp. 11966- 11971 ,(2014) , 10.3748/WJG.V20.I34.11966
Gian Luca Baiocchi, Daniele Marrelli, Giuseppe Verlato, Paolo Morgagni, Simone Giacopuzzi, Arianna Coniglio, Alberto Marchet, Fausto Rosa, Michela Giulii Capponi, Alberto Di Leo, Luca Saragoni, Luca Ansaloni, Fabio Pacelli, Donato Nitti, Domenico D’Ugo, Franco Roviello, Guido A. M. Tiberio, Stefano M. Giulini, Giovanni De Manzoni, Follow-Up After Gastrectomy for Cancer: An Appraisal of the Italian Research Group for Gastric Cancer Annals of Surgical Oncology. ,vol. 21, pp. 2005- 2011 ,(2014) , 10.1245/S10434-014-3534-8
Roberta Cardoso, Natalie G. Coburn, Rajini Seevaratnam, Alyson Mahar, Lucy Helyer, Calvin Law, Simron Singh, A systematic review of patient surveillance after curative gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a brief review Gastric Cancer. ,vol. 15, pp. 164- 167 ,(2012) , 10.1007/S10120-012-0142-9
Sharlene Gill, Amil Shah, Nhu Le, E. Francis Cook, Eric M. Yoshida, Asian Ethnicity–Related Differences in Gastric Cancer Presentation and Outcome Among Patients Treated at a Canadian Cancer Center Journal of Clinical Oncology. ,vol. 21, pp. 2070- 2076 ,(2003) , 10.1200/JCO.2003.11.054
Yasuhiro Kodera, Seiji Ito, Yoshitaka Yamamura, Yoshinari Mochizuki, Michitaka Fujiwara, Kenji Hibi, Katsuki Ito, Seiji Akiyama, Akimasa Nakao, Follow-up surveillance for recurrence after curative gastric cancer surgery lacks survival benefit. Annals of Surgical Oncology. ,vol. 10, pp. 898- 902 ,(2003) , 10.1245/ASO.2003.12.009
Alice C. Wei, Paul D. Greig, David Grant, Bryce Taylor, Bernard Langer, Steven Gallinger, Survival After Hepatic Resection for Colorectal Metastases: A 10-Year Experience Annals of Surgical Oncology. ,vol. 13, pp. 668- 676 ,(2006) , 10.1245/ASO.2006.05.039
Renata D. Peixoto, Howard J. Lim, Haerin Kim, Ahmad Abdullah, Winson Y. Cheung, Patterns of Surveillance Following Curative Intent Therapy for Gastroesophageal Cancer Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer. ,vol. 45, pp. 325- 333 ,(2014) , 10.1007/S12029-014-9601-3
John S. Macdonald, Stephen R. Smalley, Jacqueline Benedetti, Scott A. Hundahl, Norman C. Estes, Grant N. Stemmermann, Daniel G. Haller, Jaffer A. Ajani, Leonard L. Gunderson, J. Milburn Jessup, James A. Martenson, Chemoradiotherapy after Surgery Compared with Surgery Alone for Adenocarcinoma of the Stomach or Gastroesophageal Junction The New England Journal of Medicine. ,vol. 345, pp. 725- 730 ,(2001) , 10.1056/NEJMOA010187
Ing Tuan Tan, Bok Yan Jimmy So, None, Value of intensive follow-up of patients after curative surgery for gastric carcinoma. Journal of Surgical Oncology. ,vol. 96, pp. 503- 506 ,(2007) , 10.1002/JSO.20823