Enamel loss and superficial aspect during bonding and debonding of metallic brackets = Perda de esmalte e aspecto superficial durante colagem e descolagem de bráquetes metálicos

作者: Emanuelle de Fátima Ferreira , Giselle Naback Lemes Vilani , Wellington Corrêa Jansen , Hélio Henrique de Araújo Brito , Ricardo Alberto Neto Ferreira

DOI: 10.14393/BJ-V32N2A2016-30162

关键词: Enamel paintScanning electron microscopePolishingOrthodonticsSurface roughnessMaterials scienceQualitative analysisAbrasion (dental)Sem analysisResin composite

摘要: To evaluate the cumulative enamel loss during bonding and debonding procedures of orthodontic metallic brackets to analyze superficial roughness.  Forty-seven maxillary first premolars were obtained for quantitative qualitative analysis.  For analysis, forty weighed at each stage treatment equivalent thickness was measured. The amount tooth mass in divided by density value obtain corresponding volume lost. Subsequently, these volumes a circular area with diameter 7 mm, thus obtaining loss. They assessed under following conditions: as sound enamel, after acid conditioning, removal residual resin composite, final polishing high or low-speed, without water refrigeration. A rugosimeter used graphic registration roughness before conditioning. data analyzed Quantikov software Shapiro Wilk’s Wilcoxon statistical tests roughness. one-way ANOVA followed Bonferroni Post-Hoc loss.  scanning electron microscopy (SEM) surfaces performed on seven premolars, one step. Acid conditioning significantly increased surface (p<0.01). Based dental evaluation, statistically significant all stages However, when 4 different methods compared, no differences registered regarding mineralized structure (p=0.72). SEM analysis revealed that tungsten-carbide bur refrigeration low-speed rubber points caused less damage enamel. greatest due losses relative abrasion composite protocols similar. Finally, none restored their original aspects brackets.

参考文章(24)
Phillip M. Campbell, Enamel surfaces after orthodontic bracket debonding. Angle Orthodontist. ,vol. 65, pp. 103- 110 ,(1995) , 10.1043/0003-3219(1995)065<0103:ESAOBD>2.0.CO;2
Richard S. Manly, Harold C. Hodge, Louise E. Ange, Density and Refractive Index Studies of Dental Hard Tissues II. Density Distribution Curves 1,2 Journal of Dental Research. ,vol. 18, pp. 203- 211 ,(1939) , 10.1177/00220345390180030301
P. Lambrechts, M. Braem, M. Vuylsteke-Wauters, G. Vanherle, Quantitative in vivo Wear of Human Enamel Journal of Dental Research. ,vol. 68, pp. 1752- 1754 ,(1989) , 10.1177/00220345890680120601
M. Brännström, O. Malmgren, K-J. Nordenvall, Etching of young permanent teeth with an acid gel American Journal of Orthodontics. ,vol. 82, pp. 379- 383 ,(1982) , 10.1016/0002-9416(82)90186-5
Richard S. Manly, Harold C. Hodge, Density and Refractive Index Studies of Dental Hard Tissues I. Methods for Separation and Determination of Purity Journal of Dental Research. ,vol. 18, pp. 133- 141 ,(1939) , 10.1177/00220345390180020301
Robert Edward Thompson, David C. Way, Enamel loss due to prophylaxis and multiple bonding/debonding of orthodontic attachments. American Journal of Orthodontics. ,vol. 79, pp. 282- 295 ,(1981) , 10.1016/0002-9416(81)90076-2
K. Zarrinnia, N.M. Eid, M.J. Kehoe, The effect of different debonding techniques on the enamel surface: an in vitro qualitative study. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. ,vol. 108, pp. 284- 293 ,(1995) , 10.1016/S0889-5406(95)70023-4
Alastair Gardner, Ross Hobson, Variations in acid-etch patterns with different acids and etch times American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. ,vol. 120, pp. 64- 67 ,(2001) , 10.1067/MOD.2001.114643
Keith V. Krell, James M. Courey, Samir E. Bishara, Orthodontic bracket removal using conventional and ultrasonic debonding techniques, enamel loss, and time requirements American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. ,vol. 103, pp. 258- 266 ,(1993) , 10.1016/0889-5406(93)70007-B
Wolfgang Carstensen, Clinical results after direct bonding of brackets using shorter etching times. American Journal of Orthodontics. ,vol. 89, pp. 70- 72 ,(1986) , 10.1016/0002-9416(86)90114-4