Treatments of actinic cheilitis: A systematic review of the literature

作者: Michela Lai , Riccardo Pampena , Luigi Cornacchia , Giovanni Pellacani , Ketty Peris

DOI: 10.1016/J.JAAD.2019.07.106

关键词: Ingenol mebutateActinic cheilitisDiclofenacDermatologyImiquimodFluorouracilAdverse effectComplete responsePhotodynamic therapyMedicine

摘要: Background No large studies have defined the best treatment of actinic cheilitis. Methods We conducted a systematic review to define therapies for cheilitis in clinical response and recurrences. Results first identified 444 papers, 49 were finally considered, including 789 patients 843 treated areas. The following recorded order frequency: laser therapy, photodynamic therapy (PDT), 3% diclofenac 2.5% hyaluronic acid, PDT + 5% imiquimod, aminolevulinic acid–laser or methyl-aminolevulinic acid–laser, 5% fluorouracil, partial surgery, 0.015% ingenol mebutate, 50% trichloroacetic laser + PDT. Concerning primary outcome, complete was achieved 76.5% patients, 10.2% had Partial surgery showed highest rates (14 14 [100%] 244 260 [93.8%], respectively) with low Only limited number other therapies, exception PDT, 68.9% responses 12.6% Interestingly, when combined efficacy PDT significantly enhanced. Limitations Heterogeneity across studies. Conclusion Laser appears option among nonsurgical approaches cheilitis, higher sequentially imiquimod. Larger are needed confirm these data.

参考文章(65)
N Cassano, I Romano, G A Vena, D Fai, Methyl-aminolevulinate photodynamic therapy for the treatment of actinic cheilitis: a retrospective evaluation of 29 patients. Giornale italiano di dermatologia e venereologia : organo ufficiale, Società italiana di dermatologia e sifilografia. ,vol. 147, pp. 99- 101 ,(2012)
Roy G Geronemus, Macrene R Alexiades-Armenakas, Laser-mediated photodynamic therapy of actinic cheilitis. Journal of Drugs in Dermatology. ,vol. 3, pp. 548- ,(2004)
A. NEDER, O. NAHLIELI, I. KAPLAN, CO2 laser used in surgical treatment of actinic cheilitis Journal of Clinical Laser Medicine & Surgery. ,vol. 10, pp. 373- 375 ,(1992) , 10.1089/CLM.1992.10.373
Timothy M. Johnson, Theodore S. Sebastien, Lori Lowe, Bruce R. Nelson, Carbon dioxide laser treatment of actinic cheilitis: Clinicohistopathologic correlation to determine the optimal depth of destruction Journal of The American Academy of Dermatology. ,vol. 27, pp. 737- 740 ,(1992) , 10.1016/0190-9622(92)70247-D
Dario Fai, Eugenio Romanello, Marta Benedetta Brumana, Carlotta Fai, Gino Antonio Vena, Nicoletta Cassano, Stefano Piaserico, Daylight photodynamic therapy with methyl‐aminolevulinate for the treatment of actinic cheilitis Dermatologic Therapy. ,vol. 28, pp. 355- 368 ,(2015) , 10.1111/DTH.12258
RICHARD E. FITZPATRICK, MITCHEL P. GOLDMAN, JAVIER RUIZ-ESPARZA, Clinical advantage of the CO2 laser superpulsed mode. Treatment of verruca vulgaris, seborrheic keratoses, lentigines, and actinic cheilitis. The Journal of Dermatologic Surgery and Oncology. ,vol. 20, pp. 449- 456 ,(1992) , 10.1111/J.1524-4725.1994.TB03215.X
Amishi Y. Shah, Sean D. Doherty, Ted Rosen, Actinic cheilitis: a treatment review International Journal of Dermatology. ,vol. 49, pp. 1225- 1234 ,(2010) , 10.1111/J.1365-4632.2010.04580.X
Sue Kyung Kim, Hyo Sang Song, You Chan Kim, Topical photodynamic therapy may not be effective for actinic cheilitis despite repeated treatments. European Journal of Dermatology. ,vol. 23, pp. 917- 918 ,(2013) , 10.1684/EJD.2013.2199
E Sotiriou, Z Apalla, E Chovarda, D Panagiotidou, D Ioannides, Photodynamic therapy with 5-aminolevulinic acid in actinic cheilitis: an 18-month clinical and histological follow-up. Journal of The European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology. ,vol. 24, pp. 916- 920 ,(2009) , 10.1111/J.1468-3083.2009.03550.X
Assi Levi, Hans C. Wulf, Claes D. Enk, Two cases of actinic cheilitis responsive to daylight-activated photodynamic therapy (DA-PDT). Photodermatology, Photoimmunology and Photomedicine. ,vol. 29, pp. 268- 271 ,(2013) , 10.1111/PHPP.12057