Mitigation Policy Acceptance Model: An Analysis of Individual Decision Making Process toward Residential Seismic Strengthening

作者: Hao-Teng Cheng , Ko-Wan Tsou

DOI: 10.3390/IJERPH15091883

关键词: Psychological resilienceConstruct (philosophy)Risk perceptionStructural equation modelingThinking processesPsychologySeismic riskDecision-makingRisk analysis (engineering)Government

摘要: Mitigation policy is regarded as an effective strategy to achieve the purpose of building health resilience and reducing disaster risk with current high frequency environmental event occurrences. To enhance public acceptance mitigation policy, issue decision-making behavior has been a concern researchers planners. In past literature, qualitative measures employed reveal behavioral intention hazard cause restricted outcomes due problem sample representativeness fact that quantitative research discuss linear relationship between two selected variables. The this article attempt construct Policy Acceptance Model (MPAM) analyze seismic strategies. Based on Dual Processing Theory, affective conducted core variable for constructing types thinking processes, variables perception, trust responsibility are in MPAM from theories research. study, residential strengthening, adapted Yongkang District Tainan, case study. According results, result model fit test confirmed framework, modes could be associated together when people face risky process. most factor influence each variable, direct effect also shown model. results provide suggestions communication strategies government.

参考文章(42)
Arzu Taylan, Factors influencing homeowners' seismic risk mitigation behavior: a case study in Zeytinburnu district of Istanbul International journal of disaster risk reduction. ,vol. 13, pp. 414- 426 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.IJDRR.2015.08.006
Li-Ju Jang, Jieh-Jiuh Wang, Douglas Paton, Ning-Yu Tsai, Cross‐cultural comparisons between the earthquake preparedness models of Taiwan and New Zealand Disasters. ,vol. 40, pp. 327- 345 ,(2016) , 10.1111/DISA.12144
S.N. Jonkman, P.H.A.J.M. van Gelder, J.K. Vrijling, An overview of quantitative risk measures for loss of life and economic damage. Journal of Hazardous Materials. ,vol. 99, pp. 1- 30 ,(2003) , 10.1016/S0304-3894(02)00283-2
Syed Ainuddin, Jayant Kumar Routray, Shabana Ainuddin, People's risk perception in earthquake prone Quetta city of Baluchistan International journal of disaster risk reduction. ,vol. 7, pp. 165- 175 ,(2014) , 10.1016/J.IJDRR.2013.10.006
Thomas R. Paradise, Perception of seismic risk in a Muslim city The Journal of North African Studies. ,vol. 11, pp. 243- 262 ,(2006) , 10.1080/13629380600802961
Michael K. Lindell, Sudha Arlikatti, Carla S. Prater, Why People Do What They Do to Protect Against Earthquake Risk: Perceptions of Hazard Adjustment Attributes Risk Analysis. ,vol. 29, pp. 1072- 1088 ,(2009) , 10.1111/J.1539-6924.2009.01243.X
Victoria Basolo, Laura J Steinberg, Raymond J Burby, Joyce Levine, Ana Maria Cruz, Chihyen Huang, The Effects of Confidence in Government and Information on Perceived and Actual Preparedness for Disasters Environment and Behavior. ,vol. 41, pp. 338- 364 ,(2009) , 10.1177/0013916508317222
Edgar L. Jackson, Response to Earthquake Hazard The West Coast of North America Environment and Behavior. ,vol. 13, pp. 387- 416 ,(1981) , 10.1177/0013916581134001