Values, objectivity and credibility of scientists in a contentious natural resource debate.
作者： Yuri T. Yamamoto
关键词: Credibility 、 Public relations 、 Political science 、 Natural resource 、 Public awareness of science 、 Objectivity (science) 、 Forest management 、 Public participation
摘要: In contentious natural resource debates, the credibility of scientists is at risk. this case study, citizens in contending communities and a forest management controversy construct...
sagepub.com
sci-hub.se 参考文章(82)
Alan Irwin, Citizen Science: A Study of People, Expertise and Sustainable Development ,(1995)
Jerome R. Ravetz, S. O. Funtowicz, A New Scientific Methodology for Global Environmental Issues ,(1991)
Connie P. Ozawa, Recasting Science: Consensual Procedures In Public Policy Making ,(2019)
Paul C. Stern, Harvey V. Fineberg, Understanding Risk: Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society ,(1996)
Helen E. Longino, The Fate of Knowledge. ,(2002)
George Cvetkovich, Timothy C. Earle, Social Trust: Toward a Cosmopolitan Society ,(1995)
Anselm L. Strauss, Juliet M. Corbin, Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory Published in <b>1998</b> in Thousand Oaks (Calif.) by Sage. ,(1998)
Eric C. Poncelet, Personal transformation in multistakeholder environmental partnerships Policy Sciences. ,vol. 34, pp. 273- 301 ,(2001) , 10.1023/A:1012659519803
Nathan Young, Ralph Matthews, Experts’ understanding of the public: knowledge control in a risk controversy Public Understanding of Science. ,vol. 16, pp. 123- 144 ,(2007) , 10.1177/0963662507060586
Russell Tytler, Sandra Duggan, Richard Gott, Public participation in an environmental dispute: Implications for science education: Public Understanding of Science. ,vol. 10, pp. 343- 364 ,(2001) , 10.1088/0963-6625/10/4/301