The Benefits of High Relaxivity for Brain Tumor Imaging: Results of a Multicenter Intraindividual Crossover Comparison of Gadobenate Dimeglumine with Gadoterate Meglumine (The BENEFIT Study)

作者: M. Vaneckova , M. Herman , M.P. Smith , M. Mechl , K.R. Maravilla

DOI: 10.3174/AJNR.A4468

关键词: Brain tumorGadodiamideGADOBENATE DIMEGLUMINEGADOTERATE MEGLUMINELesionNuclear medicineContrast enhancementGadobutrolMedicineRadiologyCrossover study

摘要: BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Gadobenate dimeglumine (MultiHance) has higher r1 relaxivity than gadoterate meglumine (Dotarem) which may permit the use of lower doses for MR imaging applications. Our aim was to compare 0.1- and 0.05-mmol/kg body weight gadobenate with 0.1-mmol/kg assessment brain tumors. MATERIALS METHODS: We performed crossover, intraindividual comparison (Arm 1) 2). Adult patients suspected or known tumors were randomized Arm 1 (70 patients) 2 (107 underwent identical examinations at 1.5T. The agents injected in randomized-sequence order, separated by 2–14 days. scanners, sequences (T1-weighted spin-echo T1-weighted high-resolution gradient-echo), acquisition timing examinations. Three blinded readers evaluated images diagnostic information (degree definition lesion extent, border delineation, visualization internal morphology, contrast enhancement) quantitatively percentage enhancement lesion-to-background ratio. Safety assessments performed. RESULTS: In 1, a highly significant superiority (P .1) observed any reader end point, exception CONCLUSIONS: Significantly superior morphologic are demonstrated on compared gadoterate. No meaningful differences recorded between

参考文章(35)
Marco Essig, Armando Tartaro, Tomasso Tartaglione, Gianpaolo Pirovano, Miles A. Kirchin, Alberto Spinazzi, Enhancing lesions of the brain: intraindividual crossover comparison of contrast enhancement after gadobenate dimeglumine versus established gadolinium comparators. Academic Radiology. ,vol. 13, pp. 744- 751 ,(2006) , 10.1016/J.ACRA.2006.02.056
Guenther Schneider, Thorsten Probst, Miles A. Kirchin, Jonas Stroeder, Peter Fries, Arno Buecker, Low-dose gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MRI of the kidney for the differential diagnosis of localized renal lesions La radiologia medica. ,vol. 120, pp. 1100- 1111 ,(2015) , 10.1007/S11547-015-0548-7
Gilles Soulez, Daniel C. Bloomgarden, Neil M. Rofsky, Martin P. Smith, Hani H. Abujudeh, Desiree E. Morgan, Richard J. Lichtenstein, Mark L. Schiebler, Franz J. Wippold, Craig Russo, Matthew J. Kuhn, Kevin W. Mennitt, Jeffrey H. Maki, Alan Stolpen, Johnson Liou, Richard C. Semelka, Miles A. Kirchin, Ningyan Shen, Gianpaolo Pirovano, Alberto Spinazzi, Prospective Cohort Study of Nephrogenic Systemic Fibrosis in Patients With Stage 3-5 Chronic Kidney Disease Undergoing MRI With Injected Gadobenate Dimeglumine or Gadoteridol. American Journal of Roentgenology. ,vol. 205, pp. 469- 478 ,(2015) , 10.2214/AJR.14.14268
Michael V. Knopp, Val M. Runge, Marco Essig, Marius Hartman, Olav Jansen, Miles A. Kirchin, Albrecht Moeller, Astrid H. Seeberg, Klaus-Peter Lodemann, Primary and secondary brain tumors at MR imaging: bicentric intraindividual crossover comparison of gadobenate dimeglumine and gadopentetate dimeglumine. Radiology. ,vol. 230, pp. 55- 64 ,(2004) , 10.1148/RADIOL.2301021085
Katia Khouri Chalouhi, Giacomo D.E. Papini, Michele Bandirali, Luca M. Sconfienza, Giovanni Di Leo, Francesco Sardanelli, Less is better? Intraindividual and interindividual comparison between 0.075 mmol/kg of gadobenate dimeglumine and 0.1 mmol/kg of gadoterate meglumine for cranial MRI. European Journal of Radiology. ,vol. 83, pp. 1245- 1249 ,(2014) , 10.1016/J.EJRAD.2014.03.030
Alvan R. Feinstein, Domenic V. Cicchetti, High agreement but low kappa: I. The problems of two paradoxes. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. ,vol. 43, pp. 543- 549 ,(1990) , 10.1016/0895-4356(90)90158-L
Cesare Colosimo, Jordi Ruscalleda, Matthias Korves, Roberto La Ferla, Corinne Wool, Paola Pianezzola, Miles A. Kirchin, Detection of intracranial metastases: a multicenter, intrapatient comparison of gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MRI with routinely used contrast agents at equal dosage. Investigative Radiology. ,vol. 36, pp. 72- 81 ,(2001) , 10.1097/00004424-200102000-00002
H.A. Rowley, G. Scialfa, P.-y. Gao, J.A. Maldjian, D. Hassell, M.J. Kuhn, F.J. Wippold, M. Gallucci, B.C. Bowen, I.M. Schmalfuss, J. Ruscalleda, S. Bastianello, C. Colosimo, Contrast-Enhanced MR Imaging of Brain Lesions: A Large-Scale Intraindividual Crossover Comparison of Gadobenate Dimeglumine versus Gadodiamide American Journal of Neuroradiology. ,vol. 29, pp. 1684- 1691 ,(2008) , 10.3174/AJNR.A1185
Nicoletta Anzalone, Tommaso Scarabino, Carlo Venturi, Concetto Cristaudo, Armando Tartaro, Giuseppe Scotti, Domenico Zimatore, Roberto Floris, Alessandro Carriero, Marcello Longo, Mario Cirillo, Maria Assunta Cova, Simona Gatti, Matthias Voth, Cesare Colosimo, Cerebral neoplastic enhancing lesions: Multicenter, randomized, crossover intraindividual comparison between gadobutrol (1.0M) and gadoterate meglumine (0.5M) at 0.1mmolGd/kg body weight in a clinical setting European Journal of Radiology. ,vol. 82, pp. 139- 145 ,(2013) , 10.1016/J.EJRAD.2011.07.005
Jean‐Marc Idée, Marc Port, Caroline Robic, Christelle Medina, Monique Sabatou, Claire Corot, None, Role of thermodynamic and kinetic parameters in gadolinium chelate stability. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. ,vol. 30, pp. 1249- 1258 ,(2009) , 10.1002/JMRI.21967