Engaging with residents' perceived risks and benefits about technologies as a way of resolving remediation dilemmas.

作者: Jason Prior , Tapan Rai

DOI: 10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2017.05.187

关键词: Environmental remediationRisk perceptionEnvironmental planningEnvironmental resource managementBody of knowledgeRisks and benefitsDiversity (politics)Inverse correlationBusinessLocal environmentPhysical context

摘要: In recent decades the diversity of remediation technologies has increased significantly, with breadth ranging from dig and dump to emergent like phytoremediation nanoremediation. The benefits these environment human health are believed be substantial. However, they also potentially constitute risks. Whilst there is a growing body knowledge about risks perspective experts, little known how residents perceive application address contaminants in their local environment. This absence poses challenge practitioners policy makers who increasingly seeking engage affected choosing technology applications. Building on broader research into perceived technologies, data telephone survey 2009 living near 13 contaminated sites Australia, regression analysis closed-ended questions coding open-ended combined identify main predictors resident's levels risk benefit technologies. identifies range factors associated residents' physical context, engagement institutions during processes, which level for found that bioremediation were as less risky more beneficial than chemical, thermal paper supports reports an inverse correlation between benefits. addition, reveals types most commonly associate

参考文章(150)
F. Berkes, W.V. Reid, T.J. Wilbanks, D. Capistrano, Conclusions: bridging scales and knowledge systems Island Press, Washington, D.C., USA. ,(2006)
D. A. Scheufele, Jon Turney, Messages and heuristics: How audiences form attitudes about emerging technologies Engaging science: Thoughts, deeds, analysis and action. ,(2006)
Stephania Cormier, Barry Dellinger, Maud Walsh, Kurt Varner, By-products of the Thermal Treatment of Hazardous Waste: Formation and Health Effects. EM (Pittsburgh, Pa.). pp. 26- 30 ,(2010)
Monica D. Ramirez-Andreotta, Janick F. Artiola, A. Jay Gandolfi, Raina M. Maier, Mark L. Brusseau, Building a co-created citizen science program with gardeners neighboring a superfund site: The Gardenroots case study. International public health journal. ,vol. 7, pp. 139- ,(2015)
K Bubna-Litic, ME Lloyd-Smith, The Role of Public Participation in the Disposal of HCBs-An Australian case Study Social Science Research Network. ,(2004)
Hank C. Jenkins-Smith, Carol L. Silva, Matthew C. Nowlin, Grant deLozier, Reversing Nuclear Opposition: Evolving Public Acceptance of a Permanent Nuclear Waste Disposal Facility Risk Analysis. ,vol. 31, pp. 629- 644 ,(2011) , 10.1111/J.1539-6924.2010.01543.X
Judith I. M. de Groot, Linda Steg, Wouter Poortinga, Values, perceived risks and benefits, and acceptability of nuclear energy. Risk Analysis. ,vol. 33, pp. 307- 317 ,(2013) , 10.1111/J.1539-6924.2012.01845.X
Michael Greenberg, Charles Haas, Anthony Cox, Karen Lowrie, Katherine McComas, Warner North, Ten most important accomplishments in risk analysis, 1980-2010. Risk Analysis. ,vol. 32, pp. 771- 781 ,(2012) , 10.1111/J.1539-6924.2012.01817.X
Jesse King, Paul Slovic, The affect heuristic in early judgments of product innovations Journal of Consumer Behaviour. ,vol. 13, pp. 411- 428 ,(2014) , 10.1002/CB.1491