Methods of parentage analysis in natural populations
作者： Adam G. Jones , William R. Ardren
DOI: 10.1046/J.1365-294X.2003.01928.X
关键词: Population 、 Strengths and weaknesses 、 Biology 、 Linkage disequilibrium 、 Data science 、 Natural (music)
摘要: The recent proliferation of hypervariable molecular markers has ushered in a surge techniques for the analysis parentage natural and experimental populations. Consequently, potential meaningful studies paternity maternity is at an all-time high. However, details implementation multifarious often differ subtle ways that can influence results analyses. Now good time to reflect on available consider their strengths weaknesses. Here, we review leading analysis, with particular emphasis those have been implemented readily useable software packages. Our survey leads some important insights respect utility different approaches. This should serve as useful guide anyone who wishes embark study parentage.
sci-hub.se 参考文章(56)
G. R. Sutherland, R. I. Richards, Yang Shen, H. A. Phillips, A. D. Thompson, D. F. Callen, J. C. Mulley, Incidence and origin of "null" alleles in the (AC)n microsatellite markers. American Journal of Human Genetics. ,vol. 52, pp. 922- 927 ,(1993)
Hans Ellegren, Microsatellite mutations in the germline:: implications for evolutionary inference Trends in Genetics. ,vol. 16, pp. 551- 558 ,(2000) , 10.1016/S0168-9525(00)02139-9
Roger Milkman, Rodney R Zeitler, Concurrent multiple paternity in natural and laboratory populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. ,vol. 78, pp. 1191- 1193 ,(1974) , 10.1093/GENETICS/78.4.1191
T. C. MARSHALL, J. SLATE, L. E. B. KRUUK, J. M. PEMBERTON, Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations Molecular Ecology. ,vol. 7, pp. 639- 655 ,(1998) , 10.1046/J.1365-294X.1998.00374.X
Wyatt W. Anderson, Frequent Multiple Insemination in a Natural Population of Drosophila pseudoobscura The American Naturalist. ,vol. 108, pp. 709- 711 ,(1974) , 10.1086/282949
David C. Queller, Keith F. Goodnight, ESTIMATING RELATEDNESS USING GENETIC MARKERS Evolution. ,vol. 43, pp. 258- 275 ,(1989) , 10.1111/J.1558-5646.1989.TB04226.X
A. G. Jones, D. Walker, C. Kvarnemo, K. Lindstrom, J. C. Avise, How cuckoldry can decrease the opportunity for sexual selection: data and theory from a genetic parentage analysis of the sand goby, Pomatoschistus minutus. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. ,vol. 98, pp. 9151- 9156 ,(2001) , 10.1073/PNAS.171310198
Sérgio D.J. Pena, Ranajit Chakraborty, Paternity testing in the DNA era Trends in Genetics. ,vol. 10, pp. 204- 209 ,(1994) , 10.1016/0168-9525(94)90257-7
K. G. Dodds, M. L. Tate, J. C. McEwan, A. M. Crawford, Exclusion probabilities for pedigree testing farm animals. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. ,vol. 92, pp. 966- 975 ,(1996) , 10.1007/BF00224036
Thomas R. Meagher, Elizabeth Thompson, The relationship between single parent and parent pair genetic likelihoods in genealogy reconstruction Theoretical Population Biology. ,vol. 29, pp. 87- 106 ,(1986) , 10.1016/0040-5809(86)90006-7