Hide and seek: extended camera-trap session lengths and autumn provide best parameters for estimating lynx densities in mountainous areas

作者: Kirsten Weingarth , Thorsten Zeppenfeld , Christoph Heibl , Marco Heurich , Ludĕk Bufka

DOI: 10.1007/S10531-015-0986-5

关键词: Wildlife managementEurasian lynxPhysical geographyTrap (plumbing)Density estimationEcologySampling (statistics)PopulationCamera trapEstimation

摘要: A tool commonly used in wildlife biology is density estimation via camera-trap monitoring coupled with capture–recapture analysis. Reliable regional estimations of animal populations are required as a basis for management decisions. However, these affected by the session design, such length session, season, and number trap sites. This method regularly to monitor Eurasian lynx (Lynx lynx) which mostly occupy forested mountain ranges Central Europe. Here we intensive field sampling data major European population investigate (1) optimal considering trade-off between closure recaptures estimates, (2) time window within year stability detection probability, recapture number, reproduction, (3) sites spacing achieve robust estimates. Using two tests, found that 80 days minimum ensure adequate quality. spatially explicit model revealed best period be late summer early winter. Based on our results, recommend similar units comparable size (~300 km2) numbers sample at least autumn traps spaced about every 2.5–3 km. Our results also indicated stable estimates could still maintained when area enlarged 760 km2 5–6 km if lengths increased.

参考文章(68)
Francesco Rovero, Paul Meek, Fridolin Zimmermann, Duccio Berzi, "Which camera trap type and how many do I need?" A review of camera features and study designs for a range of wildlife research applications Hystrix-italian Journal of Mammalogy. ,vol. 24, pp. 148- 156 ,(2013) , 10.4404/HYSTRIX-24.2-6316
Breitenmoser-Würsten, Alojzije Frkovic, Janez Cop, Christine Breitenmoser, The re-introduction of the lynx in Slovenia and its present status in Slovenia and Croatia Hystrix-italian Journal of Mammalogy. ,vol. 10, ,(1998) , 10.4404/HYSTRIX-10.1-4123
N.S. Kumar, K.U. Karanth, J. D. Nichols, Field surveys: Estimating absolute densities of tigers using capture-recapture sampling pp. 139- 152 ,(2002)
John D.C. Linnell, Jon E. Swenson, Reidar Andersen, Conservation of biodiversity in Scandinavian boreal forests: large carnivores as flagships, umbrellas, indicators, or keystones? Biodiversity and Conservation. ,vol. 9, pp. 857- 868 ,(2000) , 10.1023/A:1008969104618
Thomas R. Stanley, Kenneth P. Burnham, A closure test for time-specific capture-recapture data Environmental and Ecological Statistics. ,vol. 6, pp. 197- 209 ,(1999) , 10.1023/A:1009674322348
A. J. Noss, B. Gardner, L. Maffei, E. Cuéllar, R. Montaño, A. Romero-Muñoz, R. Sollman, A. F. O'Connell, Comparison of density estimation methods for mammal populations with camera traps in the Kaa‐Iya del Gran Chaco landscape Animal Conservation. ,vol. 15, pp. 527- 535 ,(2012) , 10.1111/J.1469-1795.2012.00545.X
Mogens Trolle, Andrew J. Noss, José Luis Passos Cordeiro, Luiz Flamarion B. Oliveira, Brazilian Tapir Density in the Pantanal : A Comparison of Systematic Camera-Trapping and Line-Transect Surveys Biotropica. ,vol. 40, pp. 211- 217 ,(2008) , 10.1111/J.1744-7429.2007.00350.X
Per Wegge, Chiranjibi Pd. Pokheral, Shant Raj Jnawali, Effects of trapping effort and trap shyness on estimates of tiger abundance from camera trap studies Animal Conservation. ,vol. 7, pp. 251- 256 ,(2004) , 10.1017/S1367943004001441