Estimation of pack density in grey wolf ( Canis lupus ) by applying spatially explicit capture-recapture models to camera trap data supported by genetic monitoring

作者: Luca Mattioli , Antonio Canu , Daniela Passilongo , Massimo Scandura , Marco Apollonio

DOI: 10.1186/S12983-018-0281-X

关键词:

摘要: Density estimation is a key issue in wildlife management but particularly challenging and labour-intensive for elusive species. Recently developed approaches based on remotely collected data capture-recapture models, though representing valid alternative to more traditional methods, have found little application species with limited morphological variation. We implemented camera trap study survey wolf packs 560-km2 area of Central Italy. Individual recognition focal animals (alpha) the was possible by relying behavioural traits validated non-invasive genotyping inter-observer agreement tests. Two types (Bayesian likelihood-based) spatially explicit (SCR) models were fitted pack capture histories, thus obtaining an density area. In two sessions trapping surveys (2014 2015), we detected maximum 12 packs. A Bayesian model implementing half-normal detection function without trap-specific response provided most robust result, corresponding 1.21 ± 0.27 packs/100 km2 2015. Average size varied from 3.40 (summer 2014, excluding pups lone-transient wolves) 4.17 (late winter-spring 2015, wolves). applied first time camera-based SCR approach wolves, providing estimate showed that this method applicable wolves under following conditions: i) existence sufficient phenotypic/behavioural variation individuals (i.e. alpha, verified genotyping); ii) investigated sufficiently large include minimum number (ideally 10); iii) pilot carried out pursue adequate sampling design train operators individual recognition. believe replicating other areas can allow assessment across range would provide reliable reference parameter ecological studies.

参考文章(66)
L. David Mech, Luigi Boitani, Wolves University of Chicago Press. ,(2003) , 10.7208/CHICAGO/9780226516981.001.0001
Kirsten Weingarth, Thorsten Zeppenfeld, Christoph Heibl, Marco Heurich, Ludĕk Bufka, Kristina Daniszová, Jörg Müller, Hide and seek: extended camera-trap session lengths and autumn provide best parameters for estimating lynx densities in mountainous areas Biodiversity and Conservation. ,vol. 24, pp. 2935- 2952 ,(2015) , 10.1007/S10531-015-0986-5
Benoît Goossens, Michael W. Bruford, Non-invasive genetic analysis in conservation Cambridge University Press. ,(2009) , 10.1017/CBO9780511626920.009
Roger Peters, L. David Mech, Scent-marking in wolves American Scientist. ,vol. 63, pp. 628- 637 ,(1975) , 10.1016/B978-0-12-319250-9.50015-3
L. David Mech, Luigi Boitani, Wolf Social Ecology Wolves: behavior, ecology and conservation. pp. 1- 34 ,(2003) , 10.7208/9780226516981-005
J. Andrew Royle, Marc Kéry, Jérôme Guélat, Spatial capture‐recapture models for search‐encounter data Methods in Ecology and Evolution. ,vol. 2, pp. 602- 611 ,(2011) , 10.1111/J.2041-210X.2011.00116.X
Marco Galaverni, Romolo Caniglia, Elena Fabbri, Pietro Milanesi, Ettore Randi, One, no one, or one hundred thousand: how many wolves are there currently in Italy? Mammal Research. ,vol. 61, pp. 13- 24 ,(2016) , 10.1007/S13364-015-0247-8
Ronald E. Mcroberts, L. David Mech, Wolf population regulation revisited-Again The Journal of Wildlife Management. ,vol. 78, pp. 963- 967 ,(2014) , 10.1002/JWMG.744
Sarah Cubaynes, Daniel R MacNulty, Daniel R Stahler, Kira A Quimby, Douglas W Smith, Tim Coulson, None, Density-dependent intraspecific aggression regulates survival in northern Yellowstone wolves (Canis lupus) Journal of Animal Ecology. ,vol. 83, pp. 1344- 1356 ,(2014) , 10.1111/1365-2656.12238