Reduced Rate of Repeated Prostate Biopsies Observed in ConfirmMDx Clinical Utility Field Study

作者: Leander Van Neste , Wim Van Criekinge , Joseph W Bigley , Erik Pasin , Jeffrey D Small

DOI:

关键词: Internal medicineBiopsyCancerOncologyHistopathologyNegative Test ResultProstate biopsyGynecologyProspective cohort studyProstateProstate cancerMedicine

摘要: Background The diagnosis of prostate cancer is dependent on histologic confirmation in biopsy core tissues. procedure invasive, puts the patient at risk for complications, and subject to significant sampling errors. An epigenetic test that uses methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction determine status cancer-associated genes GSTP1, APC, RASSF1 has been clinically validated used clinical practice increase negative predictive value men with no history compared standard histopathology. Such information can help avoid unnecessary repeat biopsies. rate may provide preliminary utility evidence relation this assay's potential impact number biopsies performed US urology practices. Objective purpose study was quantify procedures demonstrate a low histopathology who received assay result testing residual tissue. Methods In recently completed field observation study, practicing urologists called ConfirmMDx Prostate Cancer (MDxHealth, Inc, Irvine, CA) evaluate cancer-negative considered cancer. This previously 2 blinded multicenter studies showed superior over detection A total 5 practices had ordered minimum 40 commercial requisitions patients previous, course previous 18 months were contacted assess their interest participate study. Select demographic prostate-screening parameter information, as well incidence biopsy, specifically result, collected merged into 1 collective database. All from each sites results included analysis. Results 138 identified these median age 63 years, current serum prostate-specific antigen level 4.7 ng/mL. Repeat 6 (4.3%) whom found Conclusion prostatic observed group histopathologically be harboring data suggest managed using These warrant large, controlled, prospective further lower rate.

参考文章(17)
Grant D. Stewart, Leander Van Neste, Philippe Delvenne, Paul Delrée, Agnès Delga, S. Alan McNeill, Marie O'Donnell, James Clark, Wim Van Criekinge, Joseph Bigley, David J. Harrison, Clinical Utility of an Epigenetic Assay to Detect Occult Prostate Cancer in Histopathologically Negative Biopsies: Results of the MATLOC Study Journal of Urology. ,vol. 189, pp. 1110- 1116 ,(2013) , 10.1016/J.JURO.2012.08.219
Matthew J. Resnick, Daniel J. Lee, Laurie Magerfleisch, Keith N. Vanarsdalen, John E. Tomaszewski, Alan J. Wein, S. Bruce Malkowicz, Thomas J. Guzzo, Repeat Prostate Biopsy and the Incremental Risk of Clinically Insignificant Prostate Cancer Urology. ,vol. 77, pp. 548- 552 ,(2011) , 10.1016/J.UROLOGY.2010.08.063
BOB DJAVAN, VINCENT RAVERY, ALEX ZLOTTA, PIOTR DOBRONSKI, MICHAEL DOBROVITS, MITRA FAKHARI, CHRISTIAN SEITZ, MARTIN SUSANI, ANDRZEJ BORKOWSKI, LAURENT BOCCON-GIBOD, CLAUDE C. SCHULMAN, MICHAEL MARBERGER, Prospective evaluation of prostate cancer detected on biopsies 1, 2, 3 and 4: when should we stop? The Journal of Urology. ,vol. 166, pp. 1679- 1683 ,(2001) , 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)65652-2
Alan W. Partin, Leander Van Neste, Eric A. Klein, Leonard S. Marks, Jason R. Gee, Dean A. Troyer, Kimberly Rieger-Christ, J. Stephen Jones, Cristina Magi-Galluzzi, Leslie A. Mangold, Bruce J. Trock, Raymond S. Lance, Joseph W. Bigley, Wim Van Criekinge, Jonathan I. Epstein, Clinical Validation of an Epigenetic Assay to Predict Negative Histopathological Results in Repeat Prostate Biopsies Journal of Urology. ,vol. 192, pp. 1081- 1087 ,(2014) , 10.1016/J.JURO.2014.04.013
Leander Van Neste, James G Herman, Gaëtan Otto, Joseph W Bigley, Jonathan I Epstein, Wim Van Criekinge, The epigenetic promise for prostate cancer diagnosis The Prostate. ,vol. 72, pp. 1248- 1261 ,(2012) , 10.1002/PROS.22459
Stacy Loeb, H. Ballentine Carter, Sonja I. Berndt, Winnie Ricker, Edward M. Schaeffer, Complications After Prostate Biopsy: Data From SEER-Medicare The Journal of Urology. ,vol. 186, pp. 1830- 1834 ,(2011) , 10.1016/J.JURO.2011.06.057
CATHY K. NAUGHTON, DAVID C. MILLER, DOUGLAS E. MAGER, DAVID K. ORNSTEIN, WILLIAM J. CATALONA, A prospective randomized trial comparing 6 versus 12 prostate biopsy cores: impact on cancer detection. The Journal of Urology. ,vol. 164, pp. 388- 392 ,(2000) , 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)67367-3
Jyoti Mehrotra, Shobha Varde, Haiying Wang, Hsiling Chiu, Janet Vargo, Karen Gray, Raymond B. Nagle, Jaclyn R. Neri, Abhijit Mazumder, Quantitative, spatial resolution of the epigenetic field effect in prostate cancer. The Prostate. ,vol. 68, pp. 152- 160 ,(2008) , 10.1002/PROS.20675
Fritz H Schroder, Jonas Hugosson, Monique J Roobol, Teuvo LJ Tammela, Stefano Ciatto, Vera Nelen, Maciej Kwiatkowski, Marcos Lujan, Hans Lilja, Marco Zappa, Louis J Denis, Franz Recker, Alvaro Paez, Liisa Maattanen, Chris H Bangma, Gunnar Aus, Sigrid Carlsson, Arnauld Villers, Xavier Rebillard, Theodorus van der Kwast, Paula M Kujala, Bert G Blijenberg, Ulf-Hakan Stenman, Andreas Huber, Kimmo Taari, Matti Hakama, Sue M Moss, Harry J de Koning, Anssi Auvinen, None, Prostate-Cancer Mortality at 11 Years of Follow-up The New England Journal of Medicine. ,vol. 366, pp. 981- 990 ,(2012) , 10.1056/NEJMOA1113135
Layton A, Willis A, Willis Sm rd, Bagley G, Aubry W, Lieberthal R, Budget impact model: epigenetic assay can help avoid unnecessary repeated prostate biopsies and reduce healthcare spending. American health & drug benefits. ,vol. 6, pp. 15- 24 ,(2013)