The population distribution of the sagittal abdominal diameter (SAD) and SAD/height ratio among Finnish adults

作者: H. S. Kahn , H. Rissanen , K. M. Bullard , P. Knekt

DOI: 10.1111/COB.12078

关键词: PopulationDemographySupine positionGerontologyInterquartile rangeConfidence intervalStandard errorReference valuesMedicineSagittal Abdominal DiameterAnthropometry

摘要: Sagittal abdominal diameter (SAD; ‘abdominal height’ measured in supine position) may improve upon conventional anthropometry for predicting incident cardiometabolic diseases. However, the SAD is used infrequently by practitioners and epidemiologists. A representative survey of Finnish adults 2000–2001 collected body measurements including (by sliding-beam calliper) using standardized protocols. Sampled non-pregnant (ages 30+ years; 79% participation) provided 6123 from 80 health centre districts. Through stratified, complex design, these data represented 2.86 million at ages years. ranged 13.5 to 38.0 cm, with a population mean (standard error) 21.7 (0.05) cm median (interquartile range) 21.0 (19.1–23.4). Median was higher 50+ years compared 30–49 both men (22.4 [20.5–24.6] vs. 20.8 [19.3–22.7]) women (21.7 [19.6–23.9] 19.4 [17.8–21.4]). The SAD/height ratio similar (0.118) sexes 30–39 years, rising more steeply age than men. Attaining only basic education, high level, associated increased (95% confidence interval) SADs (22.6 [22.3–22.8] 22.0 [21.7–22.2]) (21.8 [21.5–22.0] 20.6 [20.4–20.8]). Finland’s early experience nationally provides normative reference values physiological insights useful investigations risk.

参考文章(44)
B. Richelsen, S. B. Pedersen, Associations between different anthropometric measurements of fatness and metabolic risk parameters in non-obese, healthy, middle-aged men. International Journal of Obesity. ,vol. 19, pp. 169- 174 ,(1995)
Bramani M, Cipolat M, Pozzato C, Tornaghi G, Rispoli A, Craveri A, Raiteri R, Anthropometric or ultrasonic measurements in assessment of visceral fat? A comparative study. International Journal of Obesity. ,vol. 18, pp. 771- 775 ,(1994)
H. A. de Almeida Paula, R. de Cássia Lanes Ribeiro, L. E. F. P. de Lima Rosado, M. V. Abranches, S. do Carmo Castro Franceschini, Relationship between waist circumference and supine abdominal height measured at different anatomical sites and cardiometabolic risk factors in older women. Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics. ,vol. 25, pp. 563- 568 ,(2012) , 10.1111/J.1365-277X.2012.01267.X
Nicole Vogelzangs, Stephen B. Kritchevsky, Aartjan T. F. Beekman, Anne B. Newman, Suzanne Satterfield, Eleanor M. Simonsick, Kristine Yaffe, Tamara B. Harris, Brenda W. J. H. Penninx, Depressive symptoms and change in abdominal obesity in older persons Archives of General Psychiatry. ,vol. 65, pp. 1386- 1393 ,(2008) , 10.1001/ARCHPSYC.65.12.1386
M Zamboni, E Turcato, F Armellini, HS Kahn, A Zivelonghi, H Santana, IA Bergamo-Andreis, O Bosello, Sagittal abdominal diameter as a practical predictor of visceral fat. International Journal of Obesity. ,vol. 22, pp. 655- 660 ,(1998) , 10.1038/SJ.IJO.0800643
Karin Van Der Kooy, Rianne Leenen, Jaap C. Seidell, Paul Deurenberg, Marjolein Visser, Abdominal diameters as indicators of visceral fat: comparison between magnetic resonance imaging and anthropometry. British Journal of Nutrition. ,vol. 70, pp. 47- 58 ,(1993) , 10.1079/BJN19930104
Colleen Keller, Kedar Chintapalli, Jack Lancaster, Correlation of anthropometry with CT in Mexican-American women. Research in Nursing & Health. ,vol. 22, pp. 145- 153 ,(1999) , 10.1002/(SICI)1098-240X(199904)22:2<145::AID-NUR6>3.0.CO;2-Z
L. Kumlin, L. Dimberg, P. Marin, Ratio of abdominal sagittal diameter to height is strong indicator of coronary risk BMJ. ,vol. 314, pp. 830- 830 ,(1997) , 10.1136/BMJ.314.7083.830
H. SUGERMAN, A. WINDSOR, M. BESSOS, L. WOLFE, Intra‐abdominal pressure, sagittal abdominal diameter and obesity comorbidity Journal of Internal Medicine. ,vol. 241, pp. 71- 79 ,(1997) , 10.1046/J.1365-2796.1997.89104000.X
Henry S. Kahn, Harland Austin, David F. Williamson, Daniel Arensberg, Simple anthropometric indices associated with ischemic heart disease Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. ,vol. 49, pp. 1017- 1024 ,(1996) , 10.1016/0895-4356(96)00113-8