Rethinking Trade-Driven Extinction Risk in Marine and Terrestrial Megafauna

作者: Loren McClenachan , Andrew B. Cooper , Nicholas K. Dulvy

DOI: 10.1016/J.CUB.2016.05.026

关键词: MegafaunaBiologyValue (mathematics)ExtinctionEcosystemEcologyPoachingIvoryBody sizeRisk assessment

摘要: Summary Large animals hunted for the high value of their parts (e.g., elephant ivory and shark fins) are at risk extinction due to both intensive international trade pressure intrinsic biological sensitivity. However, relative role trade, particularly in non-perishable products, factors driving is not well understood [1–4]. Here we identify a taxonomically diverse group >100 marine terrestrial megafauna targeted luxury markets; estimate across three points sale; test relationships among risk, value, body size; quantify effects two mitigating factors: poaching fines geographic range size. We find that size principal driver lower species, but this pattern eliminated above threshold, meaning most valuable species face regardless For example, once mean product values exceed US$12,557 kg −1 , no longer drives risk. Total scales with more strongly than animals, incentivizing hunting large individuals species. Poaching currently have little effect on risk; would need be increased 10- 100-fold effective. ranges reduce terrestrial, marine, whose ten times greater. Our results underscore evolutionary ecosystem consequences targeting geographically scale up prioritize conservation high-value avoid extinction.

参考文章(43)
F. Berkes, ECOLOGY: Globalization, Roving Bandits, and Marine Resources Science. ,vol. 311, pp. 1557- 1558 ,(2006) , 10.1126/SCIENCE.1122804
Alexis N. Rife, Brad Erisman, Alexandra Sanchez, Octavio Aburto-Oropeza, When good intentions are not enough … Insights on networks of “paper park” marine protected areas Conservation Letters. ,vol. 6, pp. 200- 212 ,(2013) , 10.1111/J.1755-263X.2012.00303.X
T. E. Martin, H. Lurbiecki, J. B. Joy, A. O. Mooers, Mammal and bird species held in zoos are less endemic and less threatened than their close relatives not held in zoos Animal Conservation. ,vol. 17, pp. 89- 96 ,(2014) , 10.1111/ACV.12069
Mark J. Costello, Bill Ballantine, Biodiversity conservation should focus on no-take Marine Reserves: 94% of Marine Protected Areas allow fishing Trends in Ecology and Evolution. ,vol. 30, pp. 507- 509 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.TREE.2015.06.011
Rodolphe Devillers, Robert L. Pressey, Alana Grech, John N. Kittinger, Graham J. Edgar, Trevor Ward, Reg Watson, Reinventing residual reserves in the sea: are we favouring ease of establishment over need for protection? Aquatic Conservation-marine and Freshwater Ecosystems. ,vol. 25, pp. 480- 504 ,(2015) , 10.1002/AQC.2445
Hampus Eriksson, Shelley Clarke, Chinese market responses to overexploitation of sharks and sea cucumbers Biological Conservation. ,vol. 184, pp. 163- 173 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.BIOCON.2015.01.018
R LEWISON, L CROWDER, A READ, S FREEMAN, Understanding impacts of fisheries bycatch on marine megafauna Trends in Ecology and Evolution. ,vol. 19, pp. 598- 604 ,(2004) , 10.1016/J.TREE.2004.09.004
Nicholas K Dulvy, Yvonne Sadovy, John D Reynolds, Extinction vulnerability in marine populations Fish and Fisheries. ,vol. 4, pp. 25- 64 ,(2003) , 10.1046/J.1467-2979.2003.00105.X
BB Collette, KE Carpenter, BA Polidoro, María José Juan-Jordá, A Boustany, DJ Die, C Elfes, W Fox, J Graves, LR Harrison, R McManus, CV Minte-Vera, R Nelson, V Restrepo, J Schratwieser, C-L Sun, A Amorim, M Brick Peres, C Canales, G Cardenas, S-K Chang, W-C Chiang, N de Oliveira Leite Jr, H Harwell, R Lessa, F Lucena Fredou, HA Oxenford, R Serra, K-T Shao, R Sumaila, S-P Wang, Reginald Watson, E Yáñez, High value and long life - Double jeopardy for tunas and billfishes Science. ,vol. 333, pp. 291- 292 ,(2011) , 10.1126/SCIENCE.1208730