DOI: 10.1080/13545700802035659
关键词: Lagging 、 Social science 、 Orthodoxy 、 Human rights 、 Social group 、 Positive economics 、 Simple (philosophy) 、 Literature survey 、 Value (ethics) 、 Heterodoxy 、 Sociology
摘要: Abstract The concept of multiple-discrimination, particularly as found in the labor market, is fast becoming common parlance among policy-making circles. Understanding discrimination no longer about uncovering simple and dualistic links between two social groups: it increasingly apparent that nature dynamics are complex because multiple positions occupied by people shaped numerous attributes. Economic theory economists, however, have hardly addressed issues multiple-discrimination or intersectional discrimination. By surveying economics literature, from orthodoxy to heterodoxy, this article shows how economists lagging behind legal human rights theorists tackling issue. A couple contemporary cases UK, those Aishah Azmi Nadia Eweida, used largely critical literature survey show value utilizing a framework acknowledge complexities nuances market rea...