Postponing emission reductions from 2020 to 2030 increases climate risks and long-term costs

作者: Michel G. J. den Elzen , Detlef P. van Vuuren , Jasper van Vliet

DOI: 10.1007/S10584-010-9798-5

关键词: Environmental protectionRisk assessmentDeveloping countryTerm (time)Global warmingGlobal temperatureGreenhouse gasCompensation (engineering)Delayed responseNatural resource economicsEnvironmental science

摘要: Substantially postponing the emission reductions, compared to ranges indicated in IPCC’s recent assessment for 2020 as required meeting longterm 2°C target, increases risk of exceeding this target. The costs a delay strategy are lower short term, but leads higher longer term. analysis shows if reductions postponed 2030 it is not likely that emissions from earlier years can be fully compensated future decades so-called ‘delayed action scenario’. A full compensation would require reduction rates coming much than those found scenario literature. Without compensation, global temperature rise target will increase. This confirms only commitments 2050 determine also path between now and 2050. To meet more ambitious targets needed developed developing countries have been pledged so far.

参考文章(13)
B. Netz, L. A. Meyer, P. R. Bosch, O. R. Davidson, R. Dave, Climate change 2007: Mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Summary for Policymakers. Climate change 2007: Mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Summary for Policymakers.. ,(2007)
M. G. J. den Elzen, D. P. van Vuuren, Peaking profiles for achieving long-term temperature targets with more likelihood at lower costs Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. ,vol. 104, pp. 17931- 17936 ,(2007) , 10.1073/PNAS.0701598104
Gary Yohe, Nebojsa Nakicenovic, Wolfgang Cramer, Hans Joachim Schellnhuber, Tom Wigley, Avoiding dangerous climate change Cambridge University Press. ,(2006) , 10.2277/0521864712
K. Zickfeld, M. Eby, H. D. Matthews, A. J. Weaver, Setting cumulative emissions targets to reduce the risk of dangerous climate change Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. ,vol. 106, pp. 16129- 16134 ,(2009) , 10.1073/PNAS.0805800106
Nebojsa Nakicenovic, Peter Kolp, Keywan Riahi, Mikiko Kainuma, Tatsuya Hanaoka, Assessment of emissions scenarios revisited Environmental Economics and Policy Studies. ,vol. 7, pp. 137- 173 ,(2006) , 10.1007/BF03353998
Myles R. Allen, David J. Frame, Chris Huntingford, Chris D. Jones, Jason A. Lowe, Malte Meinshausen, Nicolai Meinshausen, Warming caused by cumulative carbon emissions towards the trillionth tonne Nature. ,vol. 458, pp. 1163- 1166 ,(2009) , 10.1038/NATURE08019
Jasper van Vliet, Michel G.J. den Elzen, Detlef P. van Vuuren, Meeting radiative forcing targets under delayed participation Energy Economics. ,vol. 31, pp. S152- S162 ,(2009) , 10.1016/J.ENECO.2009.06.010
Malte Meinshausen, Nicolai Meinshausen, William Hare, Sarah CB Raper, Katja Frieler, Reto Knutti, David J Frame, Myles R Allen, None, Greenhouse-gas emission targets for limiting global warming to 2 °C Nature. ,vol. 458, pp. 1158- 1162 ,(2009) , 10.1038/NATURE08017