Value of postoperative surveillance after radical surgery for colorectal cancer

作者: Antoni Castells , Xavier Bessa , Montserrat Daniels , Carlos Ascaso , Antonio M. Lacy

DOI: 10.1007/BF02236257

关键词: Radical surgeryOdds ratioProportional hazards modelSurgeryCohort studyCohortColorectal cancerColorectal surgerySurvival rateMedicineGastroenterologyGeneral Medicine

摘要: PURPOSE: Early detection of recurrence after curative resection for primary colorectal cancer should improve patients' prognosis. However, the usefulness postoperative surveillance programs has not been clarified yet. The present cohort study was aimed at assessing effectiveness systematic follow-up in patients with who were operated on cure, regarding both rate tumor amenable to curative-intent surgery and survival. METHODS: One hundred ninety-nine underwent radical followed according a well-defined program, which consisted laboratory studies (including serum carcinoembryonic antigen assay) every three months, physical examination abdominal ultrasound or computed tomography six chest radiograph total colonoscopy once per year. Cohorts defined compliance proposed program. A multivariate regression model constructed predict RESULTS: forty considered be compliant whereas remaining 59 occasionally attended investigations did comply all. Although there no differences overall (38 vs. 41 percent; P = 0.52), reoperation possible 18 (34 percent) those but only 3 (12 noncompliant (P 0.05). Similarly, probability survival higher cohort, (63 37 percent 5 years; < 0.001) cancer-related (69 49 0.02) rates. Cox analysis disclosed that more advanced TNM stage (odds ratio, 8.17; 95 confidence interval, 1.13-59.29) noncompliance program 2.32; 1.50-3.60) had an independent negative impact CONCLUSION: Systematic cure increases

参考文章(27)
David R. Cox, Regression Models and Life-Tables Springer Series in Statistics. ,vol. 34, pp. 527- 541 ,(1992) , 10.1007/978-1-4612-4380-9_37
Jyrki T. Mäkelä, Five-Year Follow-up After Radical Surgery for Colorectal Cancer Archives of Surgery. ,vol. 130, pp. 1062- 1067 ,(1995) , 10.1001/ARCHSURG.1995.01430100040009
David J. Bruinvels, Anne M. Stiggelbout, Job Kievit, Hans C. van Houwellngen, J. Dik F. Habbema, Cornelis J. H. van de Velde, Follow-Up of Patients with Colorectal Cancer A Meta-Analysis Annals of Surgery. ,vol. 219, pp. 174- 182 ,(1994) , 10.1097/00000658-199402000-00009
E. L. Kaplan, Paul Meier, Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations Springer Series in Statistics. ,vol. 53, pp. 319- 337 ,(1992) , 10.1007/978-1-4612-4380-9_25
Farouk Safi, Karl H. Link, Hans G. Beger, Is follow-up of colorectal cancer patients worthwhile? Diseases of The Colon & Rectum. ,vol. 36, pp. 636- 642 ,(1993) , 10.1007/BF02238589
Norman Wolmark, Edwin R Fisher, H Samuel Wieand, Bernard Fisher, Contributing NSABP Investigators, None, The relationship of depth of penetration and tumor size to the number of positive nodes in Dukes C colorectal cancer. Cancer. ,vol. 53, pp. 2707- 2712 ,(1984) , 10.1002/1097-0142(19840615)53:12<2707::AID-CNCR2820531225>3.0.CO;2-R
R. Schiessel, M. Wunderlich, F. Herbst, Local recurrence of colorectal cancer: effect of early detection and aggressive surgery. British Journal of Surgery. ,vol. 73, pp. 342- 344 ,(2005) , 10.1002/BJS.1800730505
Glenn Steele, Follow-up plans after treatment of primary colon and rectum cancer. World Journal of Surgery. ,vol. 15, pp. 583- 588 ,(1991) , 10.1007/BF01789202