“I Don't Think that Any Peer Review Committee . . . Would Ever ‘Get’ What I Currently Do”: How Institutional Metrics for Success and Merit Risk Perpetuating the (Re)production of Colonial Relationships in Community-Based Participatory Research Involving Indigenous Peoples in Canada

摘要: This article reports on findings from a study that explored how group of leading health researchers who do Indigenous community-engaged research (n = 20) in Canada envision enacting ethically sound with communities, as well the concomitant tensions associated doing so. In particular, we explore institutional metrics for assessing merit and granting tenure are seen to privilege conventional discourses productivity validity and, result, largely incongruent relational values decolonizing through community-based participatory research. Our reveal colonial incursion academy risk filtering into such agendas create conflict between accountability community partners academic one’s discipline peers.