Co-opted Boards

作者: Jeffrey L. Coles , Naveen D. Daniel , Lalitha Naveen

DOI: 10.2139/SSRN.1699272

关键词: BusinessExplanatory powerInvestment (macroeconomics)AccountingTop managementIndependenceCorporate governanceHard asset

摘要: We argue that not all independent directors are equally effective in monitoring top management. Specifically, who appointed by the CEO likely to have stronger allegiance and will be weaker monitors. To examine this hypothesis, we propose empirically deploy two new measures of board composition. Co-option is fraction comprised after sitting assumed office. Consistent with serving measure capture, as increases intensity decreases: turnover-performance sensitivity diminishes; pay level but without a commensurate increase pay-performance sensitivity; investment hard assets increases. Further analysis suggests even co-opted less Non-Co-opted Independence –– were already on before office has more explanatory power for effectiveness than traditional independence.

参考文章(78)
Myles L. Mace, Directors: Myth and Reality ,(1971)
Eliezer M. Fich, Anil Shivdasani, Financial Fraud, Director Reputation, and Shareholder Wealth Social Science Research Network. ,(2006) , 10.2139/SSRN.687412
Amy K. Dittmar, Jan Mahrt-Smith, Corporate Governance and the Value of Cash Holdings Social Science Research Network. ,(2005) , 10.2139/SSRN.687464
Jay Dahya, Orlin Dimitrov, John J. McConnell, Dominant Shareholders, Corporate Boards and Corporate Value: A Cross-Country Analysis Social Science Research Network. ,(2006) , 10.2139/SSRN.887383
Byoung-Hyoun Hwang, Byoung-Hyoun Hwang, Seoyoung Kim, It Pays to Have Friends Social Science Research Network. ,(2008)
Renée B. Adams, Women in the Boardroom and Their Impact on Governance and Performance Social Science Research Network. ,(2008) , 10.2139/SSRN.1107721
Jay C. Hartzell, Laura T. Starks, Institutional Investors and Executive Compensation SSRN Electronic Journal. ,(2002) , 10.2139/SSRN.236592