Quantifying forest growth uncertainty on carbon payback times in a simple biomass carbon model

作者: Will Rolls , Piers M Forster

DOI: 10.1088/2515-7620/AB7FF3

关键词: StatisticsBiomass carbonGrowth functionGrowth curve (biology)Carbon uptakeTraining setRange (statistics)CarbonEnvironmental scienceCarbon sequestration

摘要: In 2018 Sterman et al (2018a) published a simple dynamic lifecycle analysis(DLCA) model for forest-sourced bioenergy. The has been widely cited since its publication, including widespread reporting of the model’s headline results within media. adapting successful replication with open-source software, we identified number changes to input parameters which improved fit forest site growth function training data. These relatively small result in large predictions carbon uptake: up 92 tC.ha−1 or 18% total at year 500. This change estimated resulted calculated payback periods (carbon sequestration parity) differed by 54 years clear-fell scenario when compared obtained using previously parameters. Notably, this uncertainty was confined forests were slower growing and where dataset not sufficiently long reach maturity. We provide parameterisations all types used original paper, propose that these better fits underlying also margins error generated curves indicate wide range possible some types. conclude that, while revised is able reproduce earlier (2018a)results, figures from paper depend heavily on how curve fitted resulting could be reduced either obtaining more extensive data (including mature types) modification function.

参考文章(41)
Jerome K Vanclay, Aaron R Weiskittel, John A Kershaw Jr, David W Hann, Forest Growth and Yield Modeling ,(2011)
James E. Smith, Linda S. Heath, Kenneth E. Skog, Richard A. Birdsey, Methods for calculating forest ecosystem and harvested carbon with standard estimates for forest types of the United States Gen. Tech. Rep. NE-343. Newtown Square, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Research Station. 216 p.. ,vol. 343, ,(2006) , 10.2737/NE-GTR-343
Harold E. Burkhart, Margarida Tomé, Modeling Forest Trees and Stands ,(2012)
Y. Pan, J. M. Chen, R. Birdsey, K. McCullough, L. He, F. Deng, Age structure and disturbance legacy of North American forests Biogeosciences. ,vol. 8, pp. 715- 732 ,(2011) , 10.5194/BG-8-715-2011
Mary Ann Branch, Thomas F. Coleman, Yuying Li, A Subspace, Interior, and Conjugate Gradient Method for Large-Scale Bound-Constrained Minimization Problems SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing. ,vol. 21, pp. 1- 23 ,(1999) , 10.1137/S1064827595289108
Michael T. Ter-Mikaelian, Stephen J. Colombo, Jiaxin Chen, The burning question: does forest bioenergy reduce carbon emissions? A review of common misconceptions about forest carbon accounting. Journal of Forestry. ,vol. 113, pp. 57- 68 ,(2015) , 10.5849/JOF.14-016
Liu Zhao-gang, Li Feng-ri, The generalized Chapman-Richards function and applications to tree and stand growth Journal of Forestry Research. ,vol. 14, pp. 19- 26 ,(2003) , 10.1007/BF02856757
Thomas Buchholz, Matthew D. Hurteau, John Gunn, David Saah, A global meta‐analysis of forest bioenergy greenhouse gas emission accounting studies Gcb Bioenergy. ,vol. 8, pp. 281- 289 ,(2016) , 10.1111/GCBB.12245
Patrick Lamers, Martin Junginger, The ‘debt’ is in the detail: A synthesis of recent temporal forest carbon analyses on woody biomass for energy Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining. ,vol. 7, pp. 373- 385 ,(2013) , 10.1002/BBB.1407
John Sterman, Thomas Fiddaman, Travis Franck, Andrew Jones, Stephanie McCauley, Philip Rice, Elizabeth Sawin, Lori Siegel, Climate interactive: the C-ROADS climate policy model System Dynamics Review. ,vol. 28, pp. 295- 305 ,(2012) , 10.1002/SDR.1474