What the Need for Closure Scale Measures and What It Does Not: Toward Differentiating Among Related Epistemic Motives

作者: Steven L. Neuberg , T. Nicole Judice , Stephen G. West

DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.72.6.1396

关键词: Discriminant validityClosure (psychology)Scale (social sciences)Cognitive closureRating scaleEpistemologyPreferenceValidityAmbiguitySocial psychologyPsychology

摘要: The Need for Closure Scale (NFCS; D. M. Webster & A. W. Kruglanski, 1994) was introduced to assess the extent which a person, faced with decision o r judgment, desires any answer, as compared confusion and ambiguity. NFCS presented being unidimensional having adequate discriminant validity. Our data contradict these conceptual psychometric claims. As scale, is redundant Personal Structure (PNS; Thompson, E. Naccarato, K. Parker, 1989). When used more appropriately multidimensional instrument, 3 of its facets are PNS Scale, 4th Fear Invalidity (M. Thompson et al., It suggested that masks important distinctions between 2 independent epistemic motives: preference quick, decisive answers (nonspecific closure) need create maintain simple structures (one form f specific closure).

参考文章(58)
Stephen R. Briggs, Robert Hogan, John A. Johnson, Handbook of personality psychology. Academic Press. ,(1997)
K. G. Jöreskog, Dag Sörbom, Analysis of linear structural relationships by maximum likelihood and least squares methods University of Uppsala, Dept. of Statistics , Distributed by International Educational Services. ,(1983)
Ladd Wheeler, Phillip Shaver, Review of personality and social psychology UMI Books on Demand. ,(1980)
Arie W Kruglanski, E Tory Higgins, None, Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles. Guilford Press. ,(1996)
Peter M. Gollwitzer, Gordon B. Moskowitz, Gordon B. Moskowitz, Gordon B. Moskowitz, Goal Effects on Action and Cognition Guilford Press. pp. 361- 399 ,(1996)