Knowledge Representation and Validation in a Decision Support System: Introducing a Variability Modelling Technique

作者: Abdelrahman Osman , Saravanan Muthaiyah , Chin Kuan , Somnuk Phon-Amnuaisuk

DOI: 10.5772/16366

关键词: Asset (economics)Credit cardContext (language use)Decision support systemDependency (project management)Process (engineering)Knowledge managementKnowledge representation and reasoningDecision-makingComputer science

摘要: Knowledge has become the main value driver for modern organizations and been described as a critical competitive asset organizations. An important feature in development application of knowledge-based systems is knowledge representation techniques used. A successful technique provides means expressing well facilitating inference processes both human machines [19]. The limitation symbolic led to study more effective models [17]. Malhotra [14] defines challenges information-sharing culture future management integration decision-making actions across inter-enterprise boundaries. This decision making process will undergo different constraints. Therefore, existence method validate Decision Support System (DSS) system highly recommended. In third generation management, acts boundary objects around which can be organized [26]. viewed constructionist pragmatic perspective good something that allows flexible thinking construction artifacts paper answers two questions [26] context DSS: 1) how define represent 2) DSS. For any decision, there are many choices maker select from [7]. selection takes place at point selected choice. example, if someone wants pay something, payment mode either by cash or credit card, point; card choices. Now, we conclude points Choices, constraint dependency rules between these collectively named variability. Task variability defined [5] number exceptions encountered characteristics work. tested importance satisfaction. Although existing approaches representing DSS, design implementation useful considers DSS much desired.

参考文章(24)
Sergio Segura, Automated Analysis of Feature Models Using Atomic Sets. software product lines. pp. 201- 207 ,(2008)
Ilkka Tuomi, The Future of Knowledge Management Lifelong learning in Europe. ,vol. 7, ,(2002)
M. Peleg, S. Tu, Decision support, knowledge representation and management in medicine. Yearbook of medical informatics. pp. 72- 80 ,(2006)
John D. Mullen, Byron M. Roth, Decision Making: Its Logic and Practice ,(1990)
M. H. Williams, Integrating ontologies and argumentation for decision-making in breast cancer Doctoral thesis, UCL (University College London).. ,(2009)
PJ Densham, Spatial decision support systems Geographical information systems. Vol. 1: principles pp. 403-412. (1991). ,(1991)
Klaus Pohl, Frank J. van der Linden, Gnter Bckle, Software Product Line Engineering: Foundations, Principles and Techniques ,(2005)
James Scanlan, Christopher Bru, Peter Hale, Design and prototyping of knowledge management software for aerospace manufacturing ISPE CE. pp. 1083- 1090 ,(2003)
Martin Molina, Building a decision support system with a knowledge modeling tool Journal of Decision Systems. ,vol. 14, pp. 303- 320 ,(2005) , 10.3166/JDS.14.303-320