Managing the Livestock–Wildlife Interface on Rangelands

作者: Johan T. du Toit , Paul C. Cross , Marion Valeix

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-46709-2_12

关键词: Opportunity costLivestockRangelandAgroforestryApex predatorWildlife conservationWildlifeGeographyNovel ecosystemAdaptive capacity

摘要: On rangelands the livestock–wildlife interface is mostly characterized by management actions aimed at controlling problems associated with competition, disease, and depredation. Wildlife communities (especially large vertebrate species) are typically incompatible agricultural development because opportunity costs of wildlife conservation unaffordable except in arid semi-arid regions. Ecological factors including provision supplementary food water for livestock, together persecution predators, result livestock replacing biomass densities far exceeding those indigenous ungulates. Diseases difficult to eradicate from free-ranging populations so veterinary controls usually focus on separating commercial herds wildlife. Persecution carnivores due their depredation has caused virtual eradication apex predators most rangelands. However, recent research points a broad range solutions reduce conflict interface. Conserving bolsters adaptive capacity rangeland providing stakeholders options dealing environmental change. This contingent upon local being empowered benefit directly resources within framework that integrates land-use sectors landscape scale. As undergo irreversible changes species invasions climate forcings, future perspective favors proactive shift attitude towards interface, problem control asset management.

参考文章(178)
Christl A Donnelly, Rosie Woodroffe, DR Cox, F John Bourne, CL Cheeseman, Richard S Clifton-Hadley, Gao Wei, George Gettinby, Peter Gilks, Helen Jenkins, W Thomas Johnston, Andrea M Le Fevre, John P McInerney, W Ivan Morrison, None, Positive and negative effects of widespread badger culling on tuberculosis in cattle Nature. ,vol. 439, pp. 843- 846 ,(2006) , 10.1038/NATURE04454
M. Nils Peterson, Jessie L. Birckhead, Kirsten Leong, Markus J. Peterson, Tarla Rai Peterson, Rearticulating the myth of human–wildlife conflict Conservation Letters. ,vol. 3, pp. 74- 82 ,(2010) , 10.1111/J.1755-263X.2010.00099.X
C SEKERCIOGLU, Increasing awareness of avian ecological function. Trends in Ecology and Evolution. ,vol. 21, pp. 464- 471 ,(2006) , 10.1016/J.TREE.2006.05.007
W. J. Ripple, J. A. Estes, R. L. Beschta, C. C. Wilmers, E. G. Ritchie, M. Hebblewhite, J. Berger, B. Elmhagen, M. Letnic, M. P. Nelson, O. J. Schmitz, D. W. Smith, A. D. Wallach, A. J. Wirsing, Status and ecological effects of the world's largest carnivores. Science. ,vol. 343, pp. 1241484- 1241484 ,(2014) , 10.1126/SCIENCE.1241484
Peter G.H. Frost, Ivan Bond, The CAMPFIRE programme in Zimbabwe: payments for wildlife services Ecological Economics. ,vol. 65, pp. 776- 787 ,(2008) , 10.1016/J.ECOLECON.2007.09.018
Alayne Oriol-Cotterill, Marion Valeix, Laurence G. Frank, Corinna Riginos, David W. Macdonald, Landscapes of Coexistence for terrestrial carnivores: the ecological consequences of being downgraded from ultimate to penultimate predator by humans Oikos. ,vol. 124, pp. 1263- 1273 ,(2015) , 10.1111/OIK.02224
Craig Stephen, Toward a modernized definition of wildlife health. Journal of Wildlife Diseases. ,vol. 50, pp. 427- 430 ,(2014) , 10.7589/2013-11-305
THOMAS A. HEBERLEIN, “Fire in the Sistine Chapel”: How Wisconsin Responded to Chronic Wasting Disease Human Dimensions of Wildlife. ,vol. 9, pp. 165- 179 ,(2004) , 10.1080/10871200490479954
Richard S. Ostfeld, Felicia Keesing, Biodiversity and Disease Risk: the Case of Lyme Disease Conservation Biology. ,vol. 14, pp. 722- 728 ,(2000) , 10.1046/J.1523-1739.2000.99014.X