Effects of Self-Regulatory Status and Practice Type on Student Performance in the Mobile Learning Environment.

作者: Jeremy Ian Tutty

DOI:

关键词: Teaching methodSelf-managementInstructional designComputer-Assisted InstructionReflective practiceComputer scienceMobile deviceMultimediaLearning environmentContext (language use)

摘要: The next generation of computer-based learning environments has arrived. This technology is characterized by mobile and portable devices such as smartphones tablet computers with wireless broadband access. With these comes the promise extending online revolution. purpose this study was to investigate effects three levels practice type (assessment aligned, reflective, none), two self-regulatory status (high low) on student performance within context instruction. Results indicated that inclusion activities in instruction a positive effect performance. Study participants who received either assessment aligned or reflective significantly outperformed did not receive practice. results does have significant Further, also attitude. Through systematic consideration specific element instruction, while considering affective elements self-regulation, began process building framework for effective design implementation learning.

参考文章(160)
Brett Farmer, Audrey Yue, Claire Brooks, Using Blogging for Higher Order Learning in Large Cohort University Teaching: A Case Study. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology. ,vol. 24, pp. 123- 136 ,(2008) , 10.14742/AJET.1215
Chris Dede, Emerging technologies, ubiquitous learning, and educational transformation european conference on technology enhanced learning. ,vol. 6964, pp. 1- 8 ,(2011) , 10.1007/978-3-642-23985-4_1
Christina Keing, Carmel McNaught, Peter Clarke, Paul Lam, Using SMSs to Engage Students in Language Learning EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology. ,vol. 2008, pp. 6132- 6141 ,(2008)
John B. Carroll, A Model of School Learning Teachers College Record. ,vol. 64, pp. 723- 723 ,(1963)
Şenay Boduroğlu, Universal Design of Instruction: Definition, Principles, and Examples ICONARP International Journal of Architecture and Planning ISSN: 2147-9380. ,vol. 2, pp. 37- 53 ,(2014)
John Traxler, Defining, Discussing and Evaluating Mobile Learning: The moving finger writes and having writ . . . . The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. ,vol. 8, pp. 1- 12 ,(2007) , 10.19173/IRRODL.V8I2.346
Richard J. Windle, Damion McCormick, Jennifer Dandrea, Heather Wharrad, The characteristics of reusable learning objects that enhance learning: A case‐study in health‐science education British Journal of Educational Technology. ,vol. 42, pp. 811- 823 ,(2011) , 10.1111/J.1467-8535.2010.01108.X
David Wiley, Impediments to Learning Object Reuse and Openness as a Potential Solution Brazilian Journal of Computers in Education. ,vol. 17, pp. 08- 10 ,(2009) , 10.5753/RBIE.2009.17.03.08
Walter Dick, James O. Carey, Lou Carey, The systematic design of instruction ,(1978)
Giasemi Vavoula, Mike Sharples, Meeting the Challenges in Evaluating Mobile Learning: a 3-level Evaluation Framework International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning. ,vol. 1, pp. 54- 75 ,(2009) , 10.4018/JMBL.2009040104