Population reduction by hunting helps control human-wildlife conflicts for a species that is a conservation success story.

作者: David L. Garshelis , Karen V. Noyce , Véronique St-Louis

DOI: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0237274

关键词: Population reductionControl (management)Agency (sociology)SocioeconomicsHuman safetyWildlifePopulationUrsusGeographyPopulation size

摘要: Among the world's large Carnivores, American black bears (Ursus americanus) are foremost conservation success story. Populations have been expanding across North America because species is adaptable and tolerant of living near people, management agencies in U.S. Canada controlled hunting other human-sources mortality. As a result, human-black bear conflicts (damage to property, general nuisance, threat human safety) dramatically increased some areas, making it urgently important develop deploy variety mitigation tools. Previous studies claimed that legal did not directly reduce conflicts, but they evaluate whether via population size. Here, we compared temporal patterns phoned-in complaints about (total ~63,500) Minnesota, USA, over 4 decades corresponding estimates: both doubled during first decade. We also quantified natural foods, found year-to-year fluctuations affected numbers complaints; however, since this variation due largely weather, factor cannot be managed. Complaints fell sharply when agency (1) shifted more responsibility for preventing mitigating public; (2) pressure population. This reduction was extreme than intended, after curtailed, regrowth slower anticipated; consequently size remained at relatively low levels statewide 2 (although with local hotspots). These long-term data indicated can kept tolerable bounds by managing through hunting; bluntness instrument deficiencies uncertainties monitoring manipulating populations, wiser maintain level where socially-acceptable try once well beyond point.

参考文章(54)
H.E. Johnson, S.W. Breck, S. Baruch-Mordo, D.L. Lewis, C.W. Lackey, K.R. Wilson, J. Broderick, J.S. Mao, J.P. Beckmann, Shifting perceptions of risk and reward: Dynamic selection for human development by black bears in the western United States Biological Conservation. ,vol. 187, pp. 164- 172 ,(2015) , 10.1016/J.BIOCON.2015.04.014
Josef Hamr, Jesse N. Popp, Dorthy L. Brown, Frank F. Mallory, Problem behaviour of black bears (Ursus americanus) in central Ontario: the effects of hunting and natural food availability Animal Biology. ,vol. 65, pp. 151- 161 ,(2015) , 10.1163/15707563-00002467
Meredith L. Gore, Barbara A. Knuth, Clifford W. Scherer, Paul D. Curtis, Evaluating a conservation investment designed to reduce human-wildlife conflict Conservation Letters. ,vol. 1, pp. 136- 145 ,(2008) , 10.1111/J.1755-263X.2008.00017.X
Özgün Emre Can, Neil D'Cruze, David L. Garshelis, John Beecham, David W. Macdonald, Resolving Human‐Bear Conflict: A Global Survey of Countries, Experts, and Key Factors Conservation Letters. ,vol. 7, pp. 501- 513 ,(2014) , 10.1111/CONL.12117
TODD W. ARNOLD, Uninformative Parameters and Model Selection Using Akaike's Information Criterion Journal of Wildlife Management. ,vol. 74, pp. 1175- 1178 ,(2010) , 10.1111/J.1937-2817.2010.TB01236.X
Brian K. Scheick, Walter McCown, Geographic distribution of American black bears in North America Ursus. ,vol. 25, pp. 24- 33 ,(2014) , 10.2192/URSUS-D-12-00020.1
Jerod A. Merkle, Hugh S. Robinson, Paul R. Krausman, Paul Alaback, Food availability and foraging near human developments by black bears Journal of Mammalogy. ,vol. 94, pp. 378- 385 ,(2013) , 10.1644/12-MAMM-A-002.1
Sharon Baruch-Mordo, Kenneth R. Wilson, David L. Lewis, John Broderick, Julie S. Mao, Stewart W. Breck, Stochasticity in Natural Forage Production Affects Use of Urban Areas by Black Bears: Implications to Management of Human-Bear Conflicts PLoS ONE. ,vol. 9, pp. e85122- ,(2014) , 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0085122
M. A. Ditmer, D. L. Garshelis, K. V. Noyce, T. G. Laske, P. A. Iaizzo, T. E. Burk, J. D. Forester, J. R. Fieberg, Behavioral and physiological responses of American black bears to landscape features within an agricultural region Ecosphere. ,vol. 6, pp. 1- 21 ,(2015) , 10.1890/ES14-00199.1