Evidence-based mapping of design heterogeneity prior to meta-analysis: a systematic review and evidence synthesis

作者: Michelle D Althuis , Douglas L Weed , Cara L Frankenfeld

DOI: 10.1186/2046-4053-3-80

关键词: Protocol (science)Meta-analysisEvidence-based practiceStudy heterogeneityMeta-Analysis as TopicAutomatic summarizationClinical study designEconometricsPopulationMedicine

摘要: Assessment of design heterogeneity conducted prior to meta-analysis is infrequently reported; it often presented post hoc explain statistical heterogeneity. However, determines the mix included studies and how they are analyzed in a meta-analysis, which turn can importantly influence results. The goal this work introduce ways improve assessment reporting summarization epidemiologic studies. In paper, we use an sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB) type 2 diabetes (T2D) as example show technique called ‘evidence mapping’ be used organize evaluate meta-analysis.. Employing systematic reproducible approach, evaluated following elements across 11 selected cohort studies: variation definitions SSB, T2D, co-variables, features population characteristics associated with specific diversity modeling strategies. Evidence mapping strategies effectively organized complex data clearly depicted For example, SSB 7 measured diet only once (with 16 years disease follow-up), 5 primarily low consumers, 3 defined study variable consumption either sugar or artificially-sweetened beverages. This exercise also identified analysis strategies, such adjustment for 17 co-variables large degree fluctuation SSB-T2D risk estimates depending on variables multivariable models (2 95% change estimate from age-adjusted model). Meta-analysis seeks understand addition computing summary estimate. strategy documents heterogeneity, thus improving practice by aiding in: 1) protocol planning, 2) transparent differences designs, 3) interpretation pooled estimates. We recommend expanding include table that summarizes would provide readers more evidence interpret

参考文章(63)
Larry V. Hedges, Michael Borenstein, Julian P. T. Higgins, Hannah R. Rothstein, Introduction to Meta-Analysis ,(2009)
Mei Chung, Issa J Dahabreh, Nira Hadar, Sara J Ratichek, James M Gaylor, Thomas A Trikalinos, Joseph Lau, None, Emerging MRI Technologies for Imaging Musculoskeletal Disorders Under Loading Stress Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US). ,(2011)
Butler M, Kane Rl, Shamliyan T, Wysocki A, Whole-Body Vibration Therapy for Osteoporosis Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US). ,(2011)
Beth Comerford, Christine Girard, David L Katz, Alyse Behrman, Jonathan Goodman, Anna-leila Williams, Michael B Bracken, The evidence base for complementary and alternative medicine: methods of Evidence Mapping with application to CAM. Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine. ,vol. 9, pp. 22- 30 ,(2003)
Barnaby C. Reeves, Julian P. T. Higgins, Craig Ramsay, Beverley Shea, Peter Tugwell, George A. Wells, An introduction to methodological issues when including non-randomised studies in systematic reviews on the effects of interventions Research Synthesis Methods. ,vol. 4, pp. 1- 11 ,(2013) , 10.1002/JRSM.1068
Simon G Thompson, Why and how Sources of Heterogeneity Should be Investigated Systematic Reviews in Health Care: Meta-Analysis in Context, Second Edition. pp. 157- 175 ,(2008) , 10.1002/9780470693926.CH9
Matthias Egger, George Davey Smith, Martin Schneider, Systematic Reviews of Observational Studies Systematic Reviews in Health Care: Meta-Analysis in Context, Second Edition. pp. 211- 227 ,(2008) , 10.1002/9780470693926.CH12
Jonathan J Deeks, Julian PT Higgins, Douglas G Altman, Cochrane Statistical Methods Group, None, Analysing data and undertaking meta‐analyses Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. pp. 243- 296 ,(2019) , 10.1002/9780470712184.CH9
Julian P. T. Higgins, Sally Green, Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions ,(2019)