作者: Michelle D Althuis , Douglas L Weed , Cara L Frankenfeld
关键词: Protocol (science) 、 Meta-analysis 、 Evidence-based practice 、 Study heterogeneity 、 Meta-Analysis as Topic 、 Automatic summarization 、 Clinical study design 、 Econometrics 、 Population 、 Medicine
摘要: Assessment of design heterogeneity conducted prior to meta-analysis is infrequently reported; it often presented post hoc explain statistical heterogeneity. However, determines the mix included studies and how they are analyzed in a meta-analysis, which turn can importantly influence results. The goal this work introduce ways improve assessment reporting summarization epidemiologic studies. In paper, we use an sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB) type 2 diabetes (T2D) as example show technique called ‘evidence mapping’ be used organize evaluate meta-analysis.. Employing systematic reproducible approach, evaluated following elements across 11 selected cohort studies: variation definitions SSB, T2D, co-variables, features population characteristics associated with specific diversity modeling strategies. Evidence mapping strategies effectively organized complex data clearly depicted For example, SSB 7 measured diet only once (with 16 years disease follow-up), 5 primarily low consumers, 3 defined study variable consumption either sugar or artificially-sweetened beverages. This exercise also identified analysis strategies, such adjustment for 17 co-variables large degree fluctuation SSB-T2D risk estimates depending on variables multivariable models (2 95% change estimate from age-adjusted model). Meta-analysis seeks understand addition computing summary estimate. strategy documents heterogeneity, thus improving practice by aiding in: 1) protocol planning, 2) transparent differences designs, 3) interpretation pooled estimates. We recommend expanding include table that summarizes would provide readers more evidence interpret