How Talker Identity Relates to Language Processing

作者: Sarah C. Creel , Micah R. Bregman

DOI: 10.1111/J.1749-818X.2011.00276.X

关键词: PerceptionVocal tractIndexicalitySpoken languageCommunicationNatural languageIdentity (music)Speech perceptionLinguisticsPsychologyVoice-onset timeLinguistics and Language

摘要: Speech carries both linguistic content – phonemes, words, sentences and talker information, sometimes called ‘indexical information’. While variability materially affects language processing, it has historically been regarded as a curiosity rather than central influence, possibly because does not fit with conception of speech sounds abstract categories. Despite this relegation to the periphery, long history research suggests that phoneme perception are interrelated. The current review argues itself may arise from phylogenetically earlier vocal recognition, discusses evidence many cues identity also speech-sound identity. Rather brushing differences aside, explicit examination role in processing can illuminate our understanding origins spoken language, nature representations themselves. Spoken contains great amount communicative information. refer things, but identifies or classifies person speaking. This dual function links other types communication systems, means recognizing speakers intertwined. Imagine someone says word cat. pitch ‘cat’ is 200 Hz, delay between opening tract beginning vocal-cord vibration 80 ms. listener process all acoustic information identify ⁄ kaet . Many would agree relatively unimportant, while 80-ms voice onset time crucial distinguishes k very similar g But what happens ‘unimportant’ information? On modular view, linked discarded by speech-processing system (e.g. Liberman Mattingly 1985). Nonetheless, details such influence comprehension they indicate speaker’s identity, refine listener’s expectations about particular likely talk about. Differing theories have different accounts identification. one two separate, independent systems identification

参考文章(107)
Vincent M. Janik, Peter J.B. Slater, Vocal Learning in Mammals Advances in the Study of Behavior. ,vol. 26, pp. 59- 99 ,(1997) , 10.1016/S0065-3454(08)60377-0
Diana Van Lancker, Jody Kreiman, Karen Emmorey, Familiar voice recognition: Patterns and parameters. Part I. Recognition of backward voices Journal of Phonetics. ,vol. 13, pp. 19- 38 ,(1985) , 10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30724-7
Thore J Bergman, Jacinta C Beehner, Dorothy L Cheney, Robert M Seyfarth, Hierarchical Classification by Rank and Kinship in Baboons Science. ,vol. 302, pp. 1234- 1236 ,(2003) , 10.1126/SCIENCE.1087513
Ralph E. Geiselman, Francis S. Bellezza, Incidental retention of speaker's voice. Memory & Cognition. ,vol. 5, pp. 658- 665 ,(1977) , 10.3758/BF03197412
Ralph E. Geiselman, Joseph M. Crawley, Incidental processing of speaker characteristics: voice as connotative information Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. ,vol. 22, pp. 15- 23 ,(1983) , 10.1016/S0022-5371(83)80003-6
James S. Magnuson, Howard C. Nusbaum, Acoustic differences, listener expectations, and the perceptual accommodation of talker variability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. ,vol. 33, pp. 391- 409 ,(2007) , 10.1037/0096-1523.33.2.391
Peter Ladefoged, D. E. Broadbent, Information Conveyed by Vowels Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. ,vol. 29, pp. 98- 104 ,(1957) , 10.1121/1.1908694
DAVID B. MILLER, Long-term recognition of father's song by female zebra finches Nature. ,vol. 280, pp. 389- 391 ,(1979) , 10.1038/280389A0