Evaluation of the bioeffects of prenatal ultrasound exposure in the cynomolgus macaque (Macaca fascicularis): I. Neonatal/infant observations

作者: A. F. Tarantal , A. G. Hendrickx

DOI: 10.1002/TERA.1420390206

关键词: Nuclear medicineFetusCircumferenceBirth weightIn uteroGestationAnatomyWhite blood cellMedicineUltrasoundPregnancyToxicologyDevelopmental biologyHealth, Toxicology and MutagenesisEmbryology

摘要: The frequency of use ultrasonography for evaluating the developing embryo/fetus has continued to rise although possible risks from exposure still remain uncertain. cynomolgus macaque (Macaca fascicularis) is currently being used in our laboratory as a model assess these risks. In utero was performed utilizing commercial real-time mechanical sector scanner with 7.5 MHz scanhead (ATL, MK 600). Maximum acoustic power output this unit follows: I(SPTA) = 12.0 mW/cm2, I(SPPA) 98 W/cm2, and Im 137 W/cm2. Animals exposed ultrasound (N 16) were scanned five times weekly on gestational days (GD) 21-35 +/- 2 10 minutes/exam (m/e), three GD 36-60 m/e, once 61-150 20 m/e. Controls 14) "scanned" placed standby. Assessment simian Apgar scores at 1, 5, minutes life revealed higher treated animals (P less than or equal 0.045); greater muscle tone 0.013) color 0.016) observed. Evaluation morphometrics birth including weight, biparietal diameter, occipitofrontal head circumference, hand foot lengths, humerus femur arm chest tail length, skinfold thickness, crown-rump length (CRL) indicated significant reduction only two parameters, weight 0.027) CRL 0.033). Hematologic analysis 9 16 1 difference white blood cell counts (WBCs). Treated displayed lower WBCs reductions numbers segmented neutrophils monocytes all ages differences not by 5-6 months age. No abortions, gross malformations, stillbirths observed animals.

参考文章(32)
Peter C. Scheidt, Fiona Stanley, Dolores A. Bryla, One-year follow-up of infants exposed to ultrasound in utero American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. ,vol. 131, pp. 743- 748 ,(1978) , 10.1016/0002-9378(78)90238-7
Martino Grandolfo, Alessandro Rindi, Protection, Michael H. Repacholi, Ultrasound: Medical Applications, Biological Effects, and Hazard Potential ,(1987)
Orleans M, Murphy J, Stark Cr, Haverkamp Ad, Short- and long-term risks after exposure to diagnostic ultrasound in utero. Obstetrics & Gynecology. ,vol. 63, pp. 194- 200 ,(1984)
R.M. McClain, Richard M. Hoar, Marcus B. Saltzman, Teratologic study of rats exposed to ultrasound American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. ,vol. 114, pp. 39- 42 ,(1972) , 10.1016/0002-9378(72)90286-4
Shlomo M. Mannor, David M. Serr, Isaschar Tamari, Asher Meshorer, Ephraim H. Frei, The safety of ultrasound in fetal monitoring American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. ,vol. 113, pp. 653- 661 ,(1972) , 10.1016/0002-9378(72)90634-5
W D Phillips, M E Towell, Doppler ultrasound and subjective assessment of fetal activity. BMJ. ,vol. 2, pp. 101- 102 ,(1979) , 10.1136/BMJ.2.6182.101
LouisM. Hellman, GillianM. Duffus, Ian Donald, Bertil Sundén, Safety of diagnostic ultrasound in obstetrics. The Lancet. ,vol. 295, pp. 1133- 1135 ,(1970) , 10.1016/S0140-6736(70)91212-2
A.H. Saad, A.R. Williams, EFFECTS OF THERAPEUTIC ULTRASOUND ON THE ACTIVITY OF THE MONONUCLEAR PHAGOCYTE SYSTEM IN VIVO Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology. ,vol. 12, pp. 145- 150 ,(1986) , 10.1016/0301-5629(86)90019-0