The political economy of place at the post-socialist urban periphery: governing growth on the edge of Moscow

作者: Oleg Golubchikov , Nicholas A Phelps

DOI: 10.1111/J.1475-5661.2011.00427.X

关键词: Urban planningPolitical economyPolitical machineIdeologyPoliticsContext (language use)PlacemakingUrbanizationMetropolitan areaSociology

摘要: What economic and policy conditions power relations govern the transformation of metropolitan periphery in post-socialist nations to what extent do these converge on those observed similar locations United States Western Europe? Drawing original empirical research conducted location, we consider case rapidly growing city Khimki at edge Moscow order expose post-Soviet variety political economy place periphery. We analyse both a broader institutional context urbanisation (ideology transition, Soviet legacy, urban planning, relationships between stakeholders) more specific aspects local growth placemaking Khimki. Superficially, recent development includes elements that resemble apparent cities liberal market economies even appear be promoted by machine politics. On closer inspection, however, regime operates as political-bureaucratic processes question relevance understanding place-centred coalitions key place. Accumulation strategies are found less cartelised localised than West seen largely decoupled from any collective or agendas. argue for need de-emphasise word ‘place’ accentuate ‘political’ notions when speaking

参考文章(32)
Tuna Taşan-Kok, Institutional and spatial change Contributions to Economics. pp. 51- 70 ,(2006) , 10.1007/3-7908-1727-9_3
Gérard Roland, Ten Years after ... Transition and Economics IMF Staff Papers. ,vol. 48, pp. 29- 52 ,(2001) , 10.2307/4621689
LASZLO J KULCSAR, TAMAS DOMOKOS, The Post-Socialist Growth Machine: The Case of Hungary International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. ,vol. 29, pp. 550- 563 ,(2005) , 10.1111/J.1468-2427.2005.00605.X
Robert Rudolph, Isolde Brade, Moscow: Processes of restructuring in the post-Soviet metropolitan periphery Cities. ,vol. 22, pp. 135- 150 ,(2005) , 10.1016/J.CITIES.2005.01.005
Gérard Roland, Understanding institutional change: Fast-moving and slow-moving institutions Studies in Comparative International Development. ,vol. 38, pp. 109- 131 ,(2004) , 10.1007/BF02686330
Kevin Ward, Rereading urban regime theory: a sympathetic critique Geoforum. ,vol. 27, pp. 427- 438 ,(1996) , 10.1016/S0016-7185(97)87197-7
Michael Gentile, Örjan Sjöberg, Intra-urban landscapes of priority : the Soviet legacy Europe-Asia Studies. ,vol. 58, pp. 701- 729 ,(2006) , 10.1080/09668130600731268