Rereading urban regime theory: a sympathetic critique

作者: Kevin Ward

DOI: 10.1016/S0016-7185(97)87197-7

关键词:

摘要: Abstract This paper examines recent theoretical exchanges around urban politics that have taken place between U.S. and U.K. academics policy makers. Urban regime theory is outlined, its development in the traced initial application considered. Using two problems are isolated interrogated: first difficulty transfer, this case from to and, second, of empiricism localism embedded way has been constructed. The realist work Kevin Cox incorporated into a critique current formulation theory. In conclusion, notes benefits constructing idealized typologies but advocates further theorizing theory, not concrete examples through those socially processes result observable typological outcomes.

参考文章(49)
Bob Jessop, None, The transition to post-Fordism and the Schumpeterian workfare state Towards a Post-Fordist Welfare State?. pp. 13- 37 ,(1994) , 10.4324/9780203359846_CHAPTER_2
Philip J. Trounstine, Terry Christensen, Movers and shakers: The study of community power ,(1982)
Roger Burrows, Brian D Loader, Towards a Post-Fordist Welfare State? ,(1994)
Harold Wolman, Michael Goldsmith, Urban Politics and Policy: A Comparative Approach ,(1992)
Gerry Stoker, Regime theory and urban politics SAGE. ,(1995)
Jamie Peck, Moving and shaking: business élites, state localism and urban privatism Progress in Human Geography. ,vol. 19, pp. 16- 46 ,(1995) , 10.1177/030913259501900102