Contrasting the core beliefs regarding the effective implementation of wind power. An international study of stakeholder perspectives
作者： Maarten Wolsink , Sylvia Breukers
DOI: 10.1080/09640561003633581
关键词: Sea breeze 、 Spatial planning 、 Power (social and political) 、 Wind power 、 Order (exchange) 、 Energy policy 、 Regional science 、 Political science 、 Environmental resource management 、 Stakeholder 、 Core (game theory)
摘要: This paper analyses patterns in beliefs about the implementation of wind power as part a geographical comparison onshore developments Netherlands, North-Rhine Westphalia and England. Q methodology is applied, order to systematically compare stakeholder views on institutional conditions changes domains energy policy, spatial planning environmental policy. Three factors represent support for from fundamentally different perspectives. The fourth perspective critical opposed well manner which projects are proposed, planned implemented. These four perspectives exist across cases; however, some prominent one case marginal another. relates legacies varying achievements three cases. analysis shows that an approach focuses implementing much possib...
core.ac.uk 
sci-hub.se 参考文章(63)
Ann Hooker Clarke, Understanding sustainable development in the context of other emergent environmental perspectives Policy Sciences. ,vol. 35, pp. 69- 90 ,(2002) , 10.1023/A:1016067819764
Patsy Healey, Claudio de Magalhaes, Ali Madanipour, John Pendlebury, Place, identity and local politics: analysing initiatives in deliberative governance Deliberative Policy Analysis. pp. 60- 87 ,(2003) , 10.1017/CBO9780511490934.004
Karin Hammarlund, Society and Wind Power in Sweden Wind Power in View#R##N#Energy Landscapes in a Crowded World. pp. 101- 114 ,(2002) , 10.1016/B978-012546334-8/50006-1
Robert K. Yin, Case Study Research: Design and Methods ,(1984)
John S. Dryzek, The Politics of the Earth: Environmental Discourses ,(1997)
Steven R. Brown, A Match Made in Heaven: A Marginalized Methodology for Studying the Marginalized Quality & Quantity. ,vol. 40, pp. 361- 382 ,(2006) , 10.1007/S11135-005-8828-2
Joseph Szarka, Wind power, policy learning and paradigm change Energy Policy. ,vol. 34, pp. 3041- 3048 ,(2006) , 10.1016/J.ENPOL.2005.05.011
D.G. Doody, P. Kearney, J. Barry, R. Moles, B. O’Regan, Evaluation of the Q-method as a method of public participation in the selection of sustainable development indicators Ecological Indicators. ,vol. 9, pp. 1129- 1137 ,(2009) , 10.1016/J.ECOLIND.2008.12.011
Claire Haggett, Over the Sea and Far Away? A Consideration of the Planning, Politics and Public Perception of Offshore Wind Farms Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning. ,vol. 10, pp. 289- 306 ,(2008) , 10.1080/15239080802242787
ROB KRUEGER, SETH TULER, THOMAS WEBLER, What Is a Good Public Participation Process? Five Perspectives from the Public Environmental Management. ,vol. 27, pp. 435- 450 ,(2001) , 10.1007/S002670010160