作者: Susan De La Paz , Mark K. Felton
DOI: 10.1016/J.CEDPSYCH.2010.03.001
关键词: Reading (process) 、 Argument 、 Control (management) 、 Mathematics education 、 Grammar school 、 Academic achievement 、 Information source 、 Pedagogy 、 Psychology 、 Argumentation theory 、 Argumentative
摘要: This study examined the effects of historical reasoning strategy instruction on 11th-grade students. Students learned inquiry strategies using 20th Century American history topics ranging from Spanish-American war to Gulf Tonkin incident. In addition, students a pre-writing for composing argumentative essays related each event. Results indicate that in comparison control group (N = 79), written by who received 81) were longer, rated as having significantly greater accuracy, more persuasive, and claims rebuttals within argument became elaborated. Importantly, read same primary secondary source document sets, feedback topics.