Measures of predator diet alone may underestimate the collective impact on prey: Common buzzard Buteo buteo consumption of economically important red grouse Lagopus lagopus scotica

作者: Richard M. Francksen , Nicholas J. Aebischer , Sonja C. Ludwig , David Baines , Mark J. Whittingham

DOI: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0221404

关键词: Buteo buteoZoologyPopulationForagingGrouseRed grouseBuzzardBiologyPredationLagopus

摘要: Human-wildlife conflicts often centre on economic loss caused by wildlife. Yet despite being a major issue for land-managers, estimating total prey losses to predation can be difficult. Estimating impacts of protected wildlife economically important also help management decisions evidence-led. The recovery in population and range common buzzards Buteo buteo Britain has brought them into conflict with some gamebird interests. However, the magnitude any impact is poorly understood. We used bioenergetics models that combine measures buzzard abundance from field surveys diets assessed using cameras at nests, remains pellet analysis, estimate their red grouse Lagopus lagopus scotica large (115 km2) moor managed shooting Scotland. Whilst consumption individual was lower than previous estimates other raptor species present our study site, could greater given an estimated 55–73 were site year-round. Averaging across diet assessment methods, during each three breeding seasons (April-July 2011–2013), foraging consumed 73–141 adult 77–185 chicks (depending year). This represented 5–11% April (22–67% mortality) 2–5% hatched (3–9% chick mortality). During two non-breeding (August-March), analysis ate 242–400 grouse, equivalent 7–11% those start August 14–33% mortality season. Buzzard potential lead non-trivial managers, but only if predated they ate, additive causes.

参考文章(62)
Laura Mckinnon, Dominique Berteaux, Gilles Gauthier, Joël Bêty, Predator-mediated interactions between preferred, alternative and incidental prey in the arctic tundra Oikos. ,vol. 122, pp. 1042- 1048 ,(2013) , 10.1111/J.1600-0706.2012.20708.X
K. A. Nagy, I. A. Girard, T. K. Brown, Energetics of free-ranging mammals, reptiles, and birds. Annual Review of Nutrition. ,vol. 19, pp. 247- 277 ,(1999) , 10.1146/ANNUREV.NUTR.19.1.247
R. E. Kenward, S. S. Walls, K. H. Hodder, M. Pahkala, S. N. Freeman, V. R. Simpson, The prevalence of non‐breeders in raptor populations: evidence from rings, radio‐tags and transect surveys Oikos. ,vol. 91, pp. 271- 279 ,(2000) , 10.1034/J.1600-0706.2000.910207.X
Jari Valkama, Erkki Korpimäki, Beatriz Arroyo, Pedro Beja, Vincent Bretagnolle, Elisabeth Bro, Robert Kenward, Santi Mañosa, Stephen M. Redpath, Simon Thirgood, Javier Viñuela, Birds of prey as limiting factors of gamebird populations in Europe: a review Biological Reviews. ,vol. 80, pp. 171- 203 ,(2005) , 10.1017/S146479310400658X
Stephen Mark Redpath, Saloni Bhatia, Juliette Young, Tilting at wildlife: reconsidering human–wildlife conflict Oryx. ,vol. 49, pp. 222- 225 ,(2015) , 10.1017/S0030605314000799
Simon J. Thirgood, Steve M. Redpath, Daniel T. Haydon, Peter Rothery, Ian Newton, Peter J. Hudson, Habitat loss and raptor predation: disentangling long- and short-term causes of red grouse declines. Proceedings of The Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. ,vol. 267, pp. 651- 656 ,(2000) , 10.1098/RSPB.2000.1051
Daniel D Roby, Donald E Lyons, David P Craig, Ken Collis, G Henk Visser, Quantifying the effect of predators on endangered species using a bioenergetics approach: Caspian terns and juvenile salmonids in the Columbia River estuary Canadian Journal of Zoology. ,vol. 81, pp. 250- 265 ,(2003) , 10.1139/Z02-242
Patrick S. Thompson, Arjun Amar, David G. Hoccom, Jeff Knott, Jeremy D. Wilson, Resolving the conflict between driven-grouse shooting and conservation of hen harriers Journal of Applied Ecology. ,vol. 46, pp. 950- 954 ,(2009) , 10.1111/J.1365-2664.2009.01687.X
Len Thomas, Stephen T. Buckland, Eric A. Rexstad, Jeff L. Laake, Samantha Strindberg, Sharon L. Hedley, Jon R.B. Bishop, Tiago A. Marques, Kenneth P. Burnham, Distance software: design and analysis of distance sampling surveys for estimating population size. Journal of Applied Ecology. ,vol. 47, pp. 5- 14 ,(2010) , 10.1111/J.1365-2664.2009.01737.X