Tilting at wildlife: reconsidering human–wildlife conflict

摘要: Conflicts between people over wildlife are widespread and damaging to both the involved. Such issues often termed human–wildlife conflicts. We argue that this term is misleading may exacerbate problems hinder resolution. A review of 100 recent articles on conflicts reveals 97 were conservation other human activities, particularly those associated with livelihoods. suggest we should distinguish impacts human–human be explicit about different interests involved in conflict. Those representing not only seek technical solutions deal but also consider their role objectives, focus strategies likely deliver long-term for benefit biodiversity