Developing practices for supporting EIA with Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis
作者： Mika Marttunen , Joonas Hokkanen , Anne Vehmas , Jyri Mustajoki , Timo P. Karjalainen
DOI:
关键词: Multiple-criteria decision analysis 、 Decision analysis 、 Management science 、 Complex problems 、 Computer science 、 Multiple criteria 、 Process (engineering) 、 Objective measurement
摘要: Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) is a general term for systematic and transparent approaches to analyze complex problems involving multiple criteria (Keeney, 1992; Belton Stewart, 2002; Gregory et al., 2012). MCDA provides great potential supporting environmental planning processes including structured framework evaluating the impacts of alternatives combining stakeholders’ subjective views about with objective measurement data alternatives. However, earlier experiences (Marttunen Hamalainen, 2008; Anderson Clemen, 2013) suggest that design realization process affects greatly how well results reflect participants’ opinions, satisfied participants are process.
参考文章(7)
L. Failing, R. Gregory, D. Ohlson, T. McDaniels, G. Long, M. Harstone, Structured Decision Making: A Practical Guide to Environmental Management Choices ,(2012)
Valerie Belton, Theodor J Stewart, Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: An Integrated Approach ,(2001)
Jenny Pope, Alan Bond, Angus Morrison-Saunders, Francois Retief, Advancing the theory and practice of impact assessment: Setting the research agenda Environmental Impact Assessment Review. ,vol. 41, pp. 1- 9 ,(2013) , 10.1016/J.EIAR.2013.01.008
Vicente-Agustín Cloquell-Ballester, Rafael Monterde-Díaz, Víctor-Andrés Cloquell-Ballester, María-Cristina Santamarina-Siurana, Systematic comparative and sensitivity analyses of additive and outranking techniques for supporting impact significance assessments Environmental Impact Assessment Review. ,vol. 27, pp. 62- 83 ,(2007) , 10.1016/J.EIAR.2006.08.005
Mika Marttunen, Jyri Mustajoki, Mikko Dufva, Timo P. Karjalainen, How to design and realize participation of stakeholders in MCDA processes? A framework for selecting an appropriate approach EURO Journal on Decision Processes. ,vol. 3, pp. 187- 214 ,(2015) , 10.1007/S40070-013-0016-3
Richard M. Anderson, Robert Clemen, Toward an Improved Methodology to Construct and Reconcile Decision Analytic Preference Judgments Decision Analysis. ,vol. 10, pp. 121- 134 ,(2013) , 10.1287/DECA.2013.0268
David W. Cash, William C. Clark, Frank Alcock, Nancy M. Dickson, Noelle Eckley, David H. Guston, Jill Jäger, Ronald B. Mitchell, Knowledge systems for sustainable development Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. ,vol. 100, pp. 8086- 8091 ,(2003) , 10.1073/PNAS.1231332100