De novo adhesions with extraperitoneal endosurgical para-aortic lymphadenectomy versus transperitoneal laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy: a randomized experimental study.

作者: Bruno Occelli , Fabrice Narducci , Dominique Lanvin , Denis Querleu , Eric Coste

DOI: 10.1067/MOB.2000.105736

关键词: ComplicationLymphadenectomyProspective cohort studyAortaLaparoscopyMedicineAdhesion (medicine)Laparoscopic surgeryPara aortic lymphadenectomySurgery

摘要: Abstract Objective: The objective of this study was to compare the risk adhesion formation and site postoperative adhesions after transperitoneal versus extraperitoneal laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy. Study Design: A prospective conducted on 66 pigs, randomly allocated 2 groups 33 animals that underwent Results: No statistically significant difference observed between techniques in terms operating time, number lymph nodes removed, intraoperative morbidity. More lymphoceles were laparoscopy group ( P =.0002). overall rates 76% 43.33% =.04). score specific operative lower =.0005). stereolocalization showed almost all situated external irradiation field, whereas predominantly outside field. Conclusion: Extraperitoneal generates significantly fewer (Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;183:529-33.)

参考文章(16)
Asselain B, Salmon Rj, Mosseri, Hamelin Jp, Pennehouat G, Pilleron Jp, Durand Jc, Lymphoceles and peritonization following lymphadenectomy for cancer of the uterus Journal De Gynecologie Obstetrique Et Biologie De La Reproduction. ,vol. 17, pp. 373- 378 ,(1988)
Roger A. Potish, Leo B. Twiggs, Konald A. Prem, Seymour H. Levitt, Leon L. Adcock, The impact of extraperitoneal surgical staging on morbidity and tumor recurrence following radiotherapy for cervical carcinoma. American Journal of Clinical Oncology. ,vol. 7, pp. 245- 251 ,(1984) , 10.1097/00000421-198406000-00009
Dorte Pedersen, Søren M. Bentzen, Jens Overgaard, EARLY AND LATE RADIOTHERAPEUTIC MORBIDITY IN 442 CONSECUTIVE PATIENTS WITH LOCALLY ADVANCED CARCINOMA OF THE UTERINE CERVIX International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics. ,vol. 29, pp. 941- 952 ,(1994) , 10.1016/0360-3016(94)90387-5
Edward B. Weiser, Brian N. Bundy, William J. Hoskins, Paul B. Heller, Richard R. Whittington, Philip J. DiSaia, Stephen L. Curry, John Schlaerth, J.Tate Thigpen, Extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal selective paraaortic lymphadenectomy in the pretreatment surgical staging of advanced cervical carcinoma (A Gynecologic Oncology Group study) Gynecologic Oncology. ,vol. 33, pp. 283- 289 ,(1990) , 10.1016/0090-8258(89)90513-1
D. Querleu, E. Leblanc, G. Ferron, F. Narducci, Laparoscopic surgery in gynaecological oncology. Ejso. ,vol. 32, pp. 853- 858 ,(2006) , 10.1016/J.EJSO.2006.03.043
Daniel Dargent, Yan Ansquer, Patrice Mathevet, Technical development and results of left extraperitoneal laparoscopic paraaortic lymphadenectomy for cervical cancer. Gynecologic Oncology. ,vol. 77, pp. 87- 92 ,(2000) , 10.1006/GYNO.1999.5585
Gunter Janetschek, Alfred Hobisch, Lorenz Holtl, Georg Bartsch, Retroperitoneal Lymphadenectomy for Clinical Stage I Nonseminomatous Testicular Tumor: Laparoscopy Versus Open Surgery and Impact of Learning Curve The Journal of Urology. ,vol. 156, pp. 89- 94 ,(1996) , 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)65948-2
Bruce A. Fine, Ronald E. Hempling, M.Steven Piver, Trudy R. Baker, Michael McAuley, Deborah Driscoll, SEVERE RADIATION MORBIDITY IN CARCINOMA OF THE CERVIX: IMPACT OF PRETHERAPY SURGICAL STAGING AND PREVIOUS SURGERY International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics. ,vol. 31, pp. 717- 723 ,(1995) , 10.1016/0360-3016(94)00458-7