Ten Reasons to Take Peak Oil Seriously

作者: Robert Brecha

DOI: 10.3390/SU5020664

关键词: Economic historyPetroleum productionEngineeringIdeologyConsumption (sociology)Fossil fuelOperations managementPeak oilNatural resourceOil production

摘要: Forty years ago, the results of modeling, as presented in The Limits to Growth, reinvigorated a discussion about exponentially growing consumption natural resources, ranging from metals fossil fuels atmospheric capacity, and how such could not continue far into future. Fifteen earlier, M. King Hubbert had made projection that petroleum production continental United States would likely reach maximum around 1970, followed by world few decades later. debate "peak oil", it has come be called, is accompanied some same vociferous denials, myths ideological polemicizing have surrounded later representations Growth. In this review, we present several lines evidence why arguments for near-term peak conventional oil should taken seriously—both sense there strong being societally unprepared declining will serious consequences.

参考文章(67)
Jorgan Randers, Dennis Meadows, The Limits to Growth: The 30-year Update ,(2004)
Albert A. Bartlett, An Analysis of U.S. and World Oil Production Patterns Using Hubbert-Style Curves Mathematical Geosciences. ,vol. 32, pp. 1- 17 ,(2000) , 10.1023/A:1007587132700
M. King Hubbert, Nuclear energy and the fossil fuels ,(1956)
J. Edward Gates, Peaking of World Oil Production Springer New York. pp. 3- 27 ,(2014) , 10.1007/978-1-4939-1954-3_1
Jørgen Randers, William W. Behrens, Dennis L. Meadows, Donella H. Meadows, The Limits to Growth ,(1972)
M.C. Lynch, Adelman, FIXED VIEW OF RESOURCE LIMITS CREATES UNDUE PESSIMISM Oil & Gas Journal. ,vol. 95, ,(1997)
Roger Bentley, Jamie Speirs, Steven Sorrell, Richard Miller, Adam Brandt, Global oil depletion - an assessment of the evidence for a near-term peak in global oil production UKERC. ,(2009)