Landscape determinants of genetic differentiation, inbreeding and genetic drift in the hazel dormouse (Muscardinus avellanarius)

作者: L. Bani , V. Orioli , G. Pisa , O. Dondina , S. Fagiani

DOI: 10.1007/S10592-017-0999-6

关键词: EcologyMetapopulationPopulationBiological dispersalDormouseInbreedingGenetic driftHabitat fragmentationBiologyMuscardinus

摘要: The dispersal process is crucial in determining the fate of populations over time, but habitat fragmentation limits or prevents it. Landscape genetic an effective tool to assess degree which still occurs fragmented landscapes. purpose this study was investigate landscape determinants differentiation hazel dormouse (Muscardinus avellanarius), a forest-dependent species conservation concern. By comparing subpopulations continuous (SLR) and (VTH) population, we (i) searched for presence Isolation-by-Resistance (IBR); (ii) estimated migration rates; (iii) evaluated inbreeding drift, their determinants. We found IBR effect VTH, heavily hindered process. overall number migrants among VTH very low (1 per generation, compared 15 SLR), although between-patch displacement about 4 km along well-structured hedgerow probably occurred. (F > 0.2 most subpopulations) drift (four out five showed private alleles on several loci, with relatively high frequencies) are particular concern VTH. However, they were be limited large patches connected by hedgerows neighbouring patches. As strategy landscape, characterized small patches, suggest that enhanced sustain functional metapopulation. For purpose, ecological network should created enhancing continuity internal features hedgerows.

参考文章(75)
Lisa Sundqvist, Kevin Keenan, Martin Zackrisson, Paulo Prodöhl, David Kleinhans, Directional genetic differentiation and asymmetric migration arXiv: Populations and Evolution. ,(2013) , 10.1002/ECE3.2096
Ilkka Hanski, Daniel Simberloff, The Metapopulation Approach, Its History, Conceptual Domain, and Application to Conservation Metapopulation Biology#R##N#Ecology, Genetics, and Evolution. pp. 5- 26 ,(1997) , 10.1016/B978-012323445-2/50003-1
Jeff A. Tracey, Individual-based modeling as a tool for conserving connectivity Connectivity Conservation. pp. 343- 368 ,(2006) , 10.1017/CBO9780511754821.016
Michael J Keough, Gerry Peter Quinn, Experimental Design and Data Analysis for Biologists ,(2002)
WINSOR H. LOWE, FRED W. ALLENDORF, What can genetics tell us about population connectivity Molecular Ecology. ,vol. 19, pp. 3038- 3051 ,(2010) , 10.1111/J.1365-294X.2010.04688.X
Alessio Mortelliti, Giovanni Amori, Dario Capizzi, Cristina Cervone, Stefano Fagiani, Barbara Pollini, Luigi Boitani, Independent effects of habitat loss, habitat fragmentation and structural connectivity on the distribution of two arboreal rodents Journal of Applied Ecology. ,vol. 48, pp. 153- 162 ,(2011) , 10.1111/J.1365-2664.2010.01918.X
Frederick William Allendorf, Gordon Luikart, Conservation and the genetics of populations ,(2006)
C. E. GRUEBER, S. NAKAGAWA, R. J. LAWS, I. G. JAMIESON, Multimodel inference in ecology and evolution: challenges and solutions Journal of Evolutionary Biology. ,vol. 24, pp. 699- 711 ,(2011) , 10.1111/J.1420-9101.2010.02210.X
Montgomery Slatkin, ESTIMATING LEVELS OF GENE FLOW IN NATURAL POPULATIONS Genetics. ,vol. 99, pp. 323- 335 ,(1981) , 10.1093/GENETICS/99.2.323