Systemic flood risk management : The challenge of accounting for hydraulic interactions

作者: Alessio Ciullo , Karin M. De Bruijn , Jan H. Kwakkel , Frans Klijn

DOI: 10.3390/W11122530

关键词: Flood mythEquity (finance)Risk distributionAccountingComputer scienceFlood risk management

摘要: Rivers typically flow through multiple flood-protected areas which are clearly interconnected, as risk reduction measures taken at one area, e.g., heightening dikes or building flood storage areas, affect elsewhere. We call these interconnections ‘hydraulic interactions’. The current approach to management, however, neglects hydraulic interactions for two reasons: They uncertain and, furthermore, considering them would require the design of policies not only striving reduction, but also accounting transfers across areas. In present paper, we compare performance identified according with those alternative formulations: One acknowledging and other including an additional decision criterion account equity in distribution Optimal first under deterministic interactions, next, they stress-tested uncertainty. found that leads a false sense equal distribution. It does, perform efficiently when risk-averse towards is taken. Accounting policies, instead, increases efficiency both considered deterministically uncertain, respectively.

参考文章(21)
R.D. Stoel, M. Sjerps, Interpretation of Forensic Evidence Handbook of risk theory: epistemology, decision theory, ethics, and social implications of risk. pp. 135- 158 ,(2012) , 10.1007/978-94-007-1433-5
Robert Lempert, Steven Popper, Steven Bankes, Shaping the Next One Hundred Years: New Methods for Quantitative Long-Term Policy Analysis RAND Corporation. ,(2003) , 10.7249/MR1626
J.M. Kind, Economically efficient flood protection standards for the Netherlands Journal of Flood Risk Management. ,vol. 7, pp. 103- 117 ,(2014) , 10.1111/JFR3.12026
M.C.L.M. van Mierlo, A.C.W.M. Vrouwenvelder, E.O.F. Calle, J.K. Vrijling, S.N. Jonkman, K.M. de Bruijn, A.H. Weerts, Assessment of flood risk accounting for river system behaviour International Journal of River Basin Management. ,vol. 5, pp. 93- 104 ,(2007) , 10.1080/15715124.2007.9635309
SVEN OVE HANSSON, PHILOSOPHICAL PROBLEMS IN COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS Economics and Philosophy. ,vol. 23, pp. 163- 183 ,(2007) , 10.1017/S0266267107001356
Joseph R. Kasprzyk, Shanthi Nataraj, Patrick M. Reed, Robert J. Lempert, Many objective robust decision making for complex environmental systems undergoing change Environmental Modelling and Software. ,vol. 42, pp. 55- 71 ,(2013) , 10.1016/J.ENVSOFT.2012.12.007
E. Zitzler, L. Thiele, M. Laumanns, C.M. Fonseca, V.G. da Fonseca, Performance assessment of multiobjective optimizers: an analysis and review IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation. ,vol. 7, pp. 117- 132 ,(2003) , 10.1109/TEVC.2003.810758
Madeleine Hayenhjelm, What is a fair distribution of risk Springer. pp. 909- 929 ,(2012) , 10.1007/978-94-007-1433-5_36
G. DI BALDASSARRE, A. CASTELLARIN, A. BRATH, Analysis of the effects of levee heightening on flood propagation: example of the River Po, Italy Hydrological Sciences Journal-journal Des Sciences Hydrologiques. ,vol. 54, pp. 1007- 1017 ,(2009) , 10.1623/HYSJ.54.6.1007