Revisiting keratoconus diagnosis and progression classification based on evaluation of corneal asymmetry indices, derived from Scheimpflug imaging in keratoconic and suspect cases

作者: John Kanellopoulos , Asimellis

DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S44741

关键词: Standard deviationKeratoconusMeridian (perimetry, visual field)Coefficient of determinationMedicineScheimpflug principleOphthalmologyKeratometerSubjective refractionCorneal asymmetry

摘要: PURPOSE To survey the standard keratoconus grading scale (Pentacam®-derived Amsler-Krumeich stages) compared to corneal irregularity indices and best spectacle-corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA). PATIENTS AND METHODS Two-hundred twelve cases were evaluated for grading, anterior surface (measured by Pentacam imaging), subjective refraction CDVA). The correlations between CDVA, keratometry, Scheimpflug seven Pentacam-derived topometric - index of variance, vertical asymmetry, index, central height decentration, minimum radius curvature analyzed using paired two-tailed t-tests, coefficient determination (r(2)), trendline linearity. RESULTS average ± deviation CDVA (expressed decimally) was 0.626 0.244 all eyes (range 0.10-1.00). flat meridian keratometry (K1) 46.7 5.89 D; steep (K2) 51.05 6.59 D. variance decentration had strongest correlation with topographic (P < 0.001). correlated poorly severity. CONCLUSION It is reported here first time that may be most sensitive specific criteria in diagnosis, progression, surgical follow-up keratoconus. classification proposed herein present a novel benchmark clinical work future studies.

参考文章(32)
Yaron S Rabinowitz, Videokeratographic indices to aid in screening for keratoconus Journal of Refractive Surgery. ,vol. 11, pp. 371- 379 ,(1995) , 10.3928/1081-597X-19950901-14
F Rüfer, A Schröder, M.-K Arvani, C Erb, [Central and peripheral corneal pachymetry--standard evaluation with the Pentacam system]. Klinische Monatsblatter Fur Augenheilkunde. ,vol. 222, pp. 117- 122 ,(2005) , 10.1055/S-2005-857908
Juan Carlos Abad, Roy S. Rubinfeld, Maria Del Valle, Michael W. Belin, Joseph M. Kurstin, Vertical D: a novel topographic pattern in some keratoconus suspects. Ophthalmology. ,vol. 114, pp. 1020- 1026 ,(2007) , 10.1016/J.OPHTHA.2006.10.022
S D Klyce, N Maeda, M K Smolek, H W Thompson, Automated keratoconus screening with corneal topography analysis. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. ,vol. 35, pp. 2749- 2757 ,(1994)
Tracy Swartz, Lisa Marten, Ming Wang, Measuring the cornea: the latest developments in corneal topography. Current Opinion in Ophthalmology. ,vol. 18, pp. 325- 333 ,(2007) , 10.1097/ICU.0B013E3281CA7121
Lisa A. Jones-Jordan, Jeffrey J. Walline, Loraine T. Sinnott, Steven M. Kymes, Karla Zadnik, Asymmetry in keratoconus and vision-related quality of life. Cornea. ,vol. 32, pp. 267- 272 ,(2013) , 10.1097/ICO.0B013E31825697C4
Michiel Dubbelman, Henk A. Weeber, Rob G. L. Van Der Heijde, Hennie J. Völker-Dieben, Radius and asphericity of the posterior corneal surface determined by corrected Scheimpflug photography Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica. ,vol. 80, pp. 379- 383 ,(2002) , 10.1034/J.1600-0420.2002.800406.X
Jay H. Krachmer, Robert S. Feder, Michael W. Belin, Keratoconus and related noninflammatory corneal thinning disorders Survey of Ophthalmology. ,vol. 28, pp. 293- 322 ,(1984) , 10.1016/0039-6257(84)90094-8
Jörg H. Krumeich, Jan Daniel, Alfred Knülle, Live-epikeratophakia for keratoconus Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery. ,vol. 24, pp. 456- 463 ,(1998) , 10.1016/S0886-3350(98)80284-8
Jyoti Khadka, Konrad Pesudovs, Colm McAlinden, A comprehensive evaluation of the precision (repeatability and reproducibility) of the Oculus Pentacam HR. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. ,vol. 52, pp. 7731- 7737 ,(2011) , 10.1167/IOVS.10-7093