Meiosis and the Neo-XY system of Dichroplus vittatus (Melanoplinae, Acrididae): a comparison between sexes.

作者: Claudio J. Bidau , Dardo A. Marti

DOI: 10.1023/A:1017908213431

关键词: Dicentric chromosomeBivalent (genetics)GeneticsY chromosomeBiologyMeiosisKaryotypeChiasmaAutosomeChromosomal inversion

摘要: The origin of neo-XY sex systems in Acrididae is usually explained through an X-autosome centric fusion, and the behaviour neo-sex chromosomes has been solely studied males. In this paper we analysed male female Dichroplus vittatus. karyotype comprises 2n = 20 including 9 pairs autosomes a chromosome pair that includes large metacentric neo-X small telocentric neo-Y. We compared meiotic bivalent between both sexes. Mean cell autosomal chiasma frequency was low sexes slightly but significantly higher males than females. Chiasma females increased when sex-bivalent included. distribution basically distal Behaviour complex as priori suggested by its structure, which mitosis meiosis diploid polyploid cells. During meiosis, orientation highly irregular; only 21% metaphase I spermatocytes show standard orientation. rest cells, alternate or simultaneous activity extra kinetochore end short arm (XL) neo-X, determined unusual MI orientations high non-disjunction lagging sex-chromosomes. females, neo-XX had more regular showed 17% asynapsis XL which, those cases orientated ends towards opposite spindle poles suggesting, again, second kinetochore. dicentric nature unstable neo-chromosomes D. vittatus suggest recent determination mechanism, with presumable adaptive advantages could compensate their potential negative heterosis. Our observations system tandem fusion two original X-chromosomes followed another megameric further pericentric inversion neo-X. remaining homolog resulted neo-Y chromosome.

参考文章(13)
Godfrey M. Hewitt, Orthoptera : grasshoppers and crickets Gebrüder Borntraeger. ,(1979)
B A Barlow, D Wiens, Translocation heterozygosity and sex ratio in Viscum fischeri Heredity. ,vol. 37, pp. 27- 40 ,(1976) , 10.1038/HDY.1976.63
B. Charlesworth, J. D. Wall, Inbreeding, heterozygote advantage and the evolution of neo–X and neo–Y sex chromosomes Proceedings of The Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. ,vol. 266, pp. 51- 56 ,(1999) , 10.1098/RSPB.1999.0603
Horacio Cardoso, Amalia Dutra, The neo-X neo-Y sex pair in Acrididae, its structure and association Chromosoma. ,vol. 70, pp. 323- 336 ,(1979) , 10.1007/BF00328770
M. J. D. White, Animal cytology and evolution. Animal cytology and evolution.. ,(1977)
N. Henriques-Gil, G. H. Jones, M. I. Cano, P. Arana, J. L. Santos, Female meiosis during oocyte maturation in Eyprepocnemis plorans (Orthoptera: Acrididae) Canadian journal of genetics and cytology. ,vol. 28, pp. 84- 87 ,(1986) , 10.1139/G86-011
Clarence E. McClung, The multiple chromosomes of Hesperotettix and Mermiria (Orthoptera) Journal of Morphology. ,vol. 29, pp. 519- 605 ,(1917) , 10.1002/JMOR.1050290207
MJD White, RE Blackith, RM Blackith, J Cheney, Cytogenetics of the viatica group morabine grasshoppers. I. The coastal species Australian Journal of Zoology. ,vol. 15, pp. 263- 302 ,(1967) , 10.1071/ZO9670263
Jorge Vieira, Brian Charlesworth, X chromosome DNA variation in Drosophila virilis Proceedings of The Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. ,vol. 266, pp. 1905- 1912 ,(1999) , 10.1098/RSPB.1999.0865