Obstetric "conveniences": elective induction of labor, cesarean birth on demand, and other potentially unnecessary interventions.

作者: Kathleen Rice Simpson , Kathleen E. Thorman

DOI: 10.1097/00005237-200504000-00010

关键词: Primary health careOn demandIntervention (counseling)Induction of laborLabour economicsPsychological interventionObstetric interventionsBeneficiaryCesarean BirthFamily medicineMedicine

摘要: Common obstetric interventions are often for "convenience" rather than clinical indications. Before proceeding, it should be clear who is the beneficiary of convenience. The primary healthcare provider must make sure that women and their partners have a full understanding what known about associated risks, benefits, alternative approaches proposed intervention. Thorough accurate information allows to choose best them infant on basis individual situation. Ideally, this discussion takes place during prenatal period when there ample opportunity ask questions, reflect potential implications, confer with family members. A review common provided. While these medically indicated well-being mothers infants, evidence supporting benefits used electively controversial.

参考文章(60)
V Handa, Obstetric anal sphincter lacerations. Obstetrics & Gynecology. ,vol. 98, pp. 225- 230 ,(2001) , 10.1016/S0029-7844(01)01445-4
J Alexander, Forty Weeks and Beyond: Pregnancy Outcomes by Week of Gestation Obstetrics & Gynecology. ,vol. 96, pp. 291- 294 ,(2000) , 10.1016/S0029-7844(00)00862-0
William F Rayburn, Jun Zhang, Rising rates of labor induction: present concerns and future strategies Obstetrics & Gynecology. ,vol. 100, pp. 164- 167 ,(2002) , 10.1016/S0029-7844(02)02047-1
Joseph R. Wax, Angelina Cartin, Michael G. Pinette, Jacquelyn Blackstone, Patient choice cesarean: An evidence-based review Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey. ,vol. 59, pp. 601- 616 ,(2004) , 10.1097/01.OGX.0000133942.76239.57
Linda J. Mayberry, Susan Gennaro, Laura Strange, Marie Williams, Anindya De, Maternal Fatigue: Implications of Second Stage Labor Nursing Care Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, & Neonatal Nursing. ,vol. 28, pp. 175- 181 ,(1999) , 10.1111/J.1552-6909.1999.TB01982.X
William D. Fraser, Sylvie Marcoux, Isabelle Krauss, Joanne Douglas, Céline Goulet, Michel Boulvain, Multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of delayed pushing for nulliparous women in the second stage of labor with continuous epidural analgesia American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. ,vol. 182, pp. 1165- 1172 ,(2000) , 10.1067/MOB.2000.105197
Eyal Sheiner, Amalia Levy, Uri Feinstein, Mordechai Hallak, Moshe Mazor, Risk factors and outcome of failure to progress during the first stage of labor: a population‐based study* Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica. ,vol. 81, pp. 222- 226 ,(2002) , 10.1034/J.1600-0412.2002.810306.X
David Segal, Eyal Sheiner, David Yohai, Ilana Shoham-Vardi, Miriam Katz, Early amniotomy – high risk factor for cesarean section European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. ,vol. 86, pp. 145- 149 ,(1999) , 10.1016/S0301-2115(99)00058-5
Joyce E. Roberts, THE “PUSH” FOR EVIDENCE: MANAGEMENT OF THE SECOND STAGE Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health. ,vol. 47, pp. 2- 15 ,(2002) , 10.1016/S1526-9523(01)00233-1