Decision Making and Decisional Tipping Points in Homicide Investigations: An Interview Study of British and Norwegian Detectives

作者: Ivar Fahsing , Karl Ask

DOI: 10.1002/JIP.1384

关键词: Interview studyOptimal decisionSuspectPsychologySituational ethicsSocial psychologyHomicideNorwegianCriminal investigationMindset

摘要: An interview study explored criminal detectives' views of critical factors related to decision making in homicide investigations. Experienced investigators Norway (n = 15) and the UK (n = 20) were asked identify decisional ‘tipping points’—decisions that put detectives a mindset focused on verifying guilt suspect—and situational or individual relate these decisions. Two types decisions identified as typical potentially tipping points: (1) name, arrest, charge suspect, (2) main strategies lines inquiry case. Moreover, 10 (e.g. experience) 14 information availability) reported likelihood shift, most which correspond well with findings previous decision-making research. The consensus between British Norwegian was very high, indicate experienced are aware many risk obstacles optimal exist Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

参考文章(25)
Nick Tilley, Melissa J. Smith, Crime Science: new approaches to preventing and detecting crime Willan: Cullompton, Devon. (2005). ,(2005)
Peter M. Gollwitzer, Action phases and mind-sets The Guilford Press. pp. 53- 92 ,(1990)
Hillel J. Einhorn, Expert judgment: Some necessary conditions and an example. Journal of Applied Psychology. ,vol. 59, pp. 562- 571 ,(1974) , 10.1037/H0037164
Karl Ask, Pär Anders Granhag, Motivational Bias in Criminal Investigators' Judgments of Witness Reliability Journal of Applied Social Psychology. ,vol. 37, pp. 561- 591 ,(2007) , 10.1111/J.1559-1816.2007.00175.X
Arie W. Kruglanski, Donna M. Webster, Motivated closing of the mind: "Seizing" and "freezing." Psychological Review. ,vol. 103, pp. 263- 283 ,(1996) , 10.1037/0033-295X.103.2.263