The impact of data realities on conservation planning

作者: Paul De Ornellas , E.J. Milner-Gulland , Emily Nicholson

DOI: 10.1016/J.BIOCON.2011.04.018

关键词: IUCN Red ListThreatened speciesSpecies distributionData qualityGeographyTaxonomic rankEnvironmental planningIndex (economics)Value (ethics)EcologyEndangered species

摘要: Abstract Conservation planning decisions are typically made on the basis of species distribution or occurrence data, which ideally would have complete spatial and taxonomic coverage. Agencies constrained in data they can collect, often pragmatically prioritising certain groups such as threatened species, methods, volunteer surveys. This mismatch between goals realities inevitably leads to bias uncertainty conservation outputs, yet few studies assessed how affect outputs. We conducted a sensitivity analysis Protection Index, method for assessing progress priorities, using an extensive dataset occurrences distributions derived from Florida Natural Areas Inventory. Analyses revealed high proportion records groups, reflecting agencies’ priorities. performed simulating ‘data poor’ scenario typical many real situations; we deleted increasing amounts both biased (exaggerating patterns observed) unbiased (random) manner. effects paucity value potential sites, Certain sites with only important were more sensitive depletion than those occurrences. Data based was influential site threat rank. To maximise benefit surveys perspective, it be better focus poorly surveyed areas rather adding already well represented sites. study demonstrates importance planning, that quality should not ignored.

参考文章(43)
R. L. PRESSEY, Conservation Planning and Biodiversity: Assembling the Best Data for the Job Conservation Biology. ,vol. 18, pp. 1677- 1681 ,(2004) , 10.1111/J.1523-1739.2004.00434.X
Winston Ponder, Using museum collection data to assist in biodiversity assessment The Other 99%: The Conservation and Biodiversity of Invertebrates. pp. 253- 256 ,(1999) , 10.7882/RZSNSW.1999.041
Federico Montesino Pouzols, Atte Moilanen, Laura Meller, Anni Arponen, Heini Kujala, Jarno Leppänen, Zonation: Spatial conservation planning framework and software version 3.0 user manual Helsingin yliopisto. ,(2006)
Michael E. Soulé, Gordon H. Orians, Conservation biology : research priorities for the next decade Island Press. ,(2001)
GEORGIA E. GARRARD, SARAH A. BEKESSY, MICHAEL A. McCARTHY, BRENDAN A. WINTLE, When have we looked hard enough? A novel method for setting minimum survey effort protocols for flora surveys Austral Ecology. ,vol. 33, pp. 986- 998 ,(2008) , 10.1111/J.1442-9993.2008.01869.X
Atte Moilanen, Hugh P. Possingham, Kerrie A. Wilson, Spatial conservation prioritization: Quantitative methods and computational tools Oxford University Press. pp. 1- 304 ,(2009)
Michele Crosetto, Stefano Tarantola, Andrea Saltelli, Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis in spatial modelling based on GIS Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. ,vol. 81, pp. 71- 79 ,(2000) , 10.1016/S0167-8809(00)00169-9
Kevin J. Gaston, Ana S. L. Rodrigues, Reserve Selection in Regions with Poor Biological Data Conservation Biology. ,vol. 17, pp. 188- 195 ,(2003) , 10.1046/J.1523-1739.2003.01268.X